Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761625›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

The efficacy of niacin supplementation in type 2 diabetes patients: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Xiaoying Yan, Shunyu Wang

Expression of concernOpen access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Xiaoying YanDepartment of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Liaoning, China.
Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81773098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDyslipidemia is a main risk factor of cardiovascular disease in the diabetic patients. Niacin was found acutely to decrease the plasma concentration of free fatty acids by inhibiting their mobilization from adipose tissue. This present study is a double blinded, randomized, and prospective trial to determine the effect of niacin during dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients.

methodsThis randomized controlled, double-blinded, single center trial is carried out according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. This present study was approved in institutional review committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. All the patients received the informed consent. Diabetic patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3-month treatment with extended-release niacin or matching placebo. The major outcome of our present study was the change in the level of HbA1c from the baseline to week 12. Secondary outcome measures contained the levels of fasting blood glucose, the concentrations of serum transaminase, the other laboratory variables, and self-reported adverse events. The P < .05 was regarded as statistically significant.

resultsWe assumed that adding the niacin to the medication in patients with type 2 diabetes would reduce dyslipidemia and achieve target lipid levels.

trial registrationThis study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5925).

Indexed as

AdultDelayed-Action PreparationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodDyslipidemiasFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedNiacinProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf ReportDelayed-Action PreparationsGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanLipidsNiacin

Identifiers

PMID33761625
PMCPMC9282106
OpenAlexW3138954588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.