Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761170›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.

Stine Eidhammer Rognan, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Kajsa Bengtsson, Helene Berg Lie, Yvonne Andersson, Morten Mowé, Liv Mathiesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of integrated medicines management on quality of discharge medication information-a secondary endpoint in a randomized controlled trial.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 'You're Just Thinking About Going Home': Exploring Person-Centred Medication Communication With Older Patients at Hospital Discharge.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 'The way you talk, do I have a choice?' Patient narratives of medication decision-making during hospitalization.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stine Eidhammer RognanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Oslo Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-9641
Sofia Kälvemark SporrongDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kajsa BengtssonDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helene Berg LieDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Yvonne AnderssonHospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Morten MowéDivision of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Liv MathiesenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are expected to participate in the hospital discharge process, assume self-management after discharge and communicate relevant information to their general practitioner; however, patients report that they are not being sufficiently empowered to take on these responsibilities. The aim of this study was to explore and understand the discharge process with a focus on medicines communication, from the patient perspective.

methodsPatients were included at a hospital ward, observed during health-care personnel encounters on the day of discharge and interviewed 1-2 weeks after discharge. A process analysis was performed, and a content analysis combined data from observations and data from patient interviews focusing on medicines communication in the discharge process.

resultsA total of 9 patients were observed on the day of discharge, equalling 67.5 hours of observations. The analysis resulted in the following themes: (a) the observed discharge process; (b) patient initiatives; and (c) the patient role. The medicines communication in the discharge process appeared unstructured. Various patient preferences and needs were revealed. The elements of the best practice structured discharge conversation were observed; however, some patients did not have a discharge conversation at all.

conclusionsThe study contributes to a broader understanding of the discharge process, how patients experience it, including their role. It is evident that the discharge process is not always tailored to meet the patients' needs. More focus on early patient involvement and communication, in order to better prepare patients for self-management of their medications, is important for their health outcomes.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPatient DischargeCommunicationHospitalsHumansQualitative Researchhospital dischargemedicines communicationobservational studypatient-centred carepatient empowermentpatient perspective

Identifiers

PMID33761170
PMCPMC8235877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.