ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2021
Inpainting-filtering for metal artifact reduction (IMIF-MAR) in computed tomography.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gumbel distribution-based technique enables quantitative comparison between streak metal artifacts of multidetector row CT and cone-beam CT: a phantom study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reduction of metal artifacts remains a challenge in computed tomography because they decrease image quality, and consequently might affect the medical diagnosis. The objective of this study is to present a novel method to correct metal artifacts based solely on the CT-slices. The proposed method consists of four steps. First, metal implants in the original CT-slice are segmented using an entropy based method, producing a metal image. Second, a prior image is acquired using three transformations: Gaussian filter, Parisotto and Schoenlieb inpainting method with the Mumford-Shah image model and L0 Gradient Minimization method (L0GM). Next, based on the projections from the original CT-slice, prior image and metal image, the sinogram is corrected in the traces affected by metal in the process called normalization and denormalization. Finally, the reconstructed image is obtained by FBP and a Nonlocal Means (NLM) filtering. The efficacy of the algorithm is evaluated by comparing five image quality metrics of the images and by inspecting regions of interest (ROI). Phantom data as well as clinical datasets are included. The proposed method is compared with three established metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods. The results from a phantom and clinical dataset show the visible reduction of artifacts. The conclusion is that IMIF-MAR method can reduce streak metal artifacts effectively and avoid new artifacts around metal implants, while preserving the anatomical structures. Considering both clinical and phantom studies, the proposed MAR algorithm improves the quality of clinical images affected by metal artifacts, and could be integrated in clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33761106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.