Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761098›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with preceptor's assistance: the training experience and outcomes in South America.

Marcos Flávio Holanda Rocha, Jurandir Maraes Picanço Neto, Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Filgueira, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Vipul Patel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  8. Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcos Flávio Holanda RochaHospital Monte Klinikum, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. marcosflaviohr@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-3438
Jurandir Maraes Picanço NetoHospital Monte Klinikum, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique de Oliveira FilgueiraHospital Monte Klinikum, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Rafael Ferreira CoelhoHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, USA.
Vipul PatelAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, USA.
Hospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRAdventHealth Celebration · USHospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Brazilian men. In 2020, sixty-five thousand new prostate cancer cases were expected in Brazil, and almost 30% of these patients are estimated to be from the northeast region. However, from 75 robotic platforms available in the country, only one is accessible in the state of Ceará since 2015. This study reports the intraoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer performed by robotic surgeons during a training period supervised by a proctor. We also compared these results with the literature reporting the experience of different Brazilian centers. We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of 58 initial cases of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy at a private Brazilian hospital in Fortaleza, Ceará. The surgeries were performed by two robotic surgeons during the training period under proctor supervision. We reported the epidemiological and intraoperative data, complications, pathological report, functional and oncological outcomes. The median operative time was 180 min. None of the patients needed conversion or blood transfusion. The pathology report described 21.81% of positive surgical margins (16.27% of all pT2 and 45.45% of all pT3 patients). The median follow-up was 40 months. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 21.73%, continence in 92%, and potency in 79.54%. No major complications (Clavien grades III-V) were reported. In our experience, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by surgeons training with proctor's assistance is feasible and safe. The operative time, complication rates, functional and oncological outcomes were satisfactory and compatible with the literature.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresBrazilHumansMaleProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsEducationProstate cancerRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID33761098
OpenAlexW3137387830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.