Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761086›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2021

Which experimental models and explorations to use in regenerative endodontics? A comprehensive review on standard practices.

A Louvrier, L Terranova, C Meyer, F Meyer, E Euvrard, M Kroemer, G Rolin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A LouvrierChirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, stomatologie et odontologie hospitalière, CHU Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France. alouvrier@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-8438
L TerranovaUMR_S 1121 Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM, FMTS, Strasbourg, France.
C MeyerChirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, stomatologie et odontologie hospitalière, CHU Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
F MeyerUMR_S 1121 Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM, FMTS, Strasbourg, France.
E EuvrardChirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, stomatologie et odontologie hospitalière, CHU Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
M KroemerUMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, 25000, Besançon, France.
G RolinUMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, 25000, Besançon, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of dental pulp stem cells, a lot of teams have expressed an interest in dental pulp regeneration. Many approaches, experimental models and biological explorations have been developed, each including the use of stem cells and scaffolds with the final goal being clinical application in humans. In this review, the authors' objective was to compare the experimental models and strategies used for the development of biomaterials for tissue engineering of dental pulp with stem cells. Electronic queries were conducted on PubMed using the following terms: pulp regeneration, scaffold, stem cells, tissue engineering and biomaterial. The extracted data included the following information: the strategy envisaged, the type of stem cells, the experimental models, the exploration or analysis methods, the cytotoxicity or viability or proliferation cellular tests, the tests of scaffold antibacterial properties and take into account the vascularization of the regenerated dental pulp. From the 71 selected articles, 59% focused on the "cell-transplantation" strategy, 82% used in vitro experimentation, 58% in vivo animal models and only one described an in vivo in situ human clinical study. 87% used dental pulp stem cells. A majority of the studies reported histology (75%) and immunohistochemistry explorations (66%). 73% mentioned the use of cytotoxicity, proliferation or viability tests. 48% took vascularization into account but only 6% studied the antibacterial properties of the scaffolds. This article gives an overview of the methods used to regenerate dental pulp from stem cells and should help researchers create the best development strategies for research in this field.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsDental ImplantationDental PulpHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicStem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringBiocompatible materialsRegenerative endodonticReviewStem cellsTissue engineeringTissue scaffold

Identifiers

PMID33761086
OpenAlexW3136268361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.