ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Landfarming as a sustainable management strategy for fresh and phytoremediated sediment.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioremediation of Olein Industry Waste by Cytobacillus sp. OWB-43 Strain.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a landfarming process (LP) in recovering sediments at different biodegradation phases: phytoremediated dredged sediments (PDS) and fresh dredged sediments (FDS). The PDS landfarming was applied to (1) reduce residual contamination and (2) improve the biological activities in order to obtain a decontaminated matrix rich in organic matter and enzymatic activity to be reused as agronomic substrate. In 3 months of LP, a microbial activity stimulation (from 7 to 48%) and a decrease in organic contamination (about 15%) were recorded. In addition, no phytotoxicity and the content in total organic carbon and nitrogen make the sediments suitable to be reused in agriculture. The FDS landfarming was carried out to (1) reduce water content, (2) transform the organic matter into a more stable form, and (3) decrease organic contaminant level. Five months of LP led to a considerable reduction in water content (40%) and to the activation of microbial biomass metabolism (from 4 to 50 times higher), which achieved proper mineralization of organic matter and contaminants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons near to zero and a total petroleum hydrocarbon reduction of about 60%). The LP also enhanced the stoichiometric ratios of nutrients and enzymes. In conclusion, the LP was a promising and economical methodology to improve the physical, chemical, and biological properties of polluted sediments at different biodegradation phases, creating a substrate ready for several environmental applications. Notably, the PDS resulted appropriate for agricultural use and FDS for civil applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.