Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761063›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning.

Alejandro Granados, Yuxuan Han, Oeslle Lucena, Vejay Vakharia, Roman Rodionov, Sjoerd B Vos, Anna Miserocchi, Andrew W McEvoy, John S Duncan, Rachel Sparks and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro GranadosSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. alejandro.granados@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-1324
Yuxuan HanSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Oeslle LucenaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Vejay VakhariaNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Roman RodionovNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Sjoerd B VosNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Anna MiserocchiNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Andrew W McEvoyNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
John S DuncanNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Rachel SparksSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sébastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218380/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectrode bending observed after stereotactic interventions is typically not accounted for in either computer-assisted planning algorithms, where straight trajectories are assumed, or in quality assessment, where only metrics related to entry and target points are reported. Our aim is to provide a fully automated and validated pipeline for the prediction of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrode bending.

methodsWe transform electrodes of 86 cases into a common space and compare features-based and image-based neural networks on their ability to regress local displacement ([Formula: see text]) or electrode bending ([Formula: see text]). Electrodes were stratified into six groups based on brain structures at the entry and target point. Models, both with and without Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, were trained and validated using tenfold cross-validation.

resultsmage-based models outperformed features-based models for all groups, and models that predicted [Formula: see text] performed better than for [Formula: see text]. Image-based model prediction with MC dropout resulted in lower mean squared error (MSE) with improvements up to 12.9% ([Formula: see text]) and 39.9% ([Formula: see text]), compared to no dropout. Using an image of brain tissue types (cortex, white and deep grey matter) resulted in similar, and sometimes better performance, compared to using a T1-weighted MRI when predicting [Formula: see text]. When inferring trajectories of image-based models (brain tissue types), 86.9% of trajectories had an MSE[Formula: see text] mm.

conclusionAn image-based approach regressing local displacement with an image of brain tissue types resulted in more accurate electrode bending predictions compared to other approaches, inputs, and outputs. Future work will investigate the integration of electrode bending into planning and quality assessment algorithms.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedAlgorithmsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMonte Carlo MethodNeurosurgeryRadiosurgerySurgery, Computer-AssistedPrediction of trajectorySEEGSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID33761063
PMCPMC8134306
OpenAlexW3135982383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.