Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761045›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy to treat mild myopia.

Mohammed Alasmari, Abdullah M Alfawaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. One-Year Visual and Refractive Outcomes of SmartPulseJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed AlasmariDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Airport Road, P.O. Box 245, Riyadh, 11411, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M AlfawazDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Airport Road, P.O. Box 245, Riyadh, 11411, Saudi Arabia. idr_alfawaz@yahoo.com.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the safety and effectiveness of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) in patients with mild myopia using the Schwind Amaris 750 s Excimer laser system which take corneal epithelium variability in consideration during ablation.

methodsA prospective case series study of patients with mild myopia with or without astigmatism (spherical equivalent ≤ -3 diopters), who underwent T-PRK as a single-step treatment, was carried out at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh between May 2017 and January 2018. The main outcomes included postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), residual refraction (manifest refraction) and complications.

resultsA total of 42 patients (84 eyes) underwent bilateral T-PRK with a preoperative spherical equivalent ranging from - 0.75 to - 3.00 D. Median spherical equivalent before Trans-PRK was - 1.75 (- 1.25to - 1.75). The spherical equivalent six months after Trans-PRK was 0.0 (- 0.25 to 0.5). All patients had a postoperative UDVA of 20/20 or better in the last follow-up. Transient postoperative corneal haze was observed in five eyes (6%).

conclusionT-PRK appears to be safe and effective in patients who have mild myopia, with or without astigmatism. The normal variation in corneal epithelial thickness seems not to affect the outcomes.

Indexed as

AstigmatismMyopiaPhotorefractive KeratectomyHumansLasers, ExcimerProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularTreatment OutcomeLasikMyopiaPhotorefractive keratectomyPRKTransepithelial

Identifiers

PMID33761045
OpenAlexW3139427318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.