Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761038›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2021

Evaluation of the PETsys TOFPET2 ASIC in multi-channel coincidence experiments.

Vanessa Nadig, David Schug, Bjoern Weissler, Volkmar Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. PET Detectors Based on Multi-Resolution SiPM Arrays.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Timing, Energy, and 3-D Spatial Resolution of the BING PET Detector Module.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Advances in Detector Instrumentation for PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa NadigDepartment of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 17, Aachen, 52074, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-0568
David SchugDepartment of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 17, Aachen, 52074, Germany.
Bjoern WeisslerDepartment of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 17, Aachen, 52074, Germany.
Volkmar SchulzDepartment of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 17, Aachen, 52074, Germany. volkmar.schulz@pmi.rwth-aachen.de.

Funding

Horizon 2020 667211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAiming to measure the difference in arrival times of two coincident γ-photons with an accuracy in the order of 200ps, time-of-flight positron emission tomography systems commonly employ silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) and high-resolution digitization electronics, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). This work evaluates the performance of the TOFPET2 ASIC, released by PETsys Electronics S.A. in 2017, dependent on its configuration parameters in multi-channel coincidence measurements.

methodsSiPM arrays fabricated by different vendors (KETEK, SensL, Hamamatsu, Broadcom) were tested in combination with the ASIC. Scintillator arrays featuring different reflector designs and different configurations of the TOFPET2 ASIC software parameters were evaluated. The benchtop setup used is provided with the TOFPET2 ASIC evaluation kit by PETsys Electronics S.A.

resultsCompared to existing studies featuring the TOFPET2 ASIC, multi-channel performance results dependent on a larger set of ASIC configuration parameters were obtained that have not been reported to this extend so far. The ASIC shows promising CRTs down to 219.9 ps in combination with two Hamamatsu S14161-3050-HS-08 SiPM arrays (128 channels read out, energy resolution 13.08%) and 216.1 ps in combination with two Broadcom AFBR-S4N44P643S SiPM arrays (32 channels read out, energy resolution 9.46%). The length of the trigger delay of the dark count suppression scheme has an impact on the ASIC performance and can be configured to further improve the coincidence resolution time. The integrator gain configuration has been investigated and allows an absolute improvement of the energy resolution by up to 1% at the cost of the linearity of the energy spectrum.

conclusionMeasuring up to the time-of-flight performance of state-of-the-art positron emission tomography (ToF-PET) systems while providing a uniform and stable readout for multiple channels at the same time, the TOFPET2 ASIC is treated as promising candidate for the integration in future ToF-PET systems.

Indexed as

Application-specific integrated circuitsASICCoincidence resolution timeCRTEnergy resolutionPETPositron emission tomographyTime-of-flightTOFPET2

Identifiers

PMID33761038
PMCPMC7991069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.