Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760952›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

KRAS mutation is predictive for poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Junfu Peng, Jun Lv, Jisheng Peng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. KRASCellular & molecular biology letters · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Biology-Based Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junfu PengDepartment of TCM Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun LvDepartment of TCM, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jisheng PengDepartment of TCM Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 51 Anwai Xiaoguan Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. jishengch@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the association between KRAS mutation and prognosis in rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

methodsLiterature was searched in the databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (PubMed) from inception to December 16, 2020. The keywords "rectal cancer" or "rectal carcinoma" or "rectal adenocarcinoma" and "KRAS" and "neoadjuvant" were used for preliminary literature retrieval. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for the KRAS mutation and clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pathologic complete remission (pCR), downstaging of T stages and tumor stages, as well as improvements in tumor regression grading (TRG). Publication bias was assessed by the funnel plots.

resultsA total of 16 articles were included for eligibility. The total number of patients was 3674 cases, with an incidence of KRAS gene mutation of 36.6% (1346/3674). Meta-analysis showed that the pooled OR for KRAS mutation on OS was 1.33 (95%CI: 113-1.56). Consistently, results also indicated that the KRAS mutant was related to the poor DFS (pooled OR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.19-2.02). However, KRAS mutation is not related to the PCR (pooled OR= 0.71, 95%CI: 0.44-1.14), downstaging in T stages (pooled OR= 0.66, 95%CI: 0.42-1.06), tumor stages (pooled OR= 1.18, 95%CI: 0.78-1.78, I2=12.9%), as well as improvement in TRG grades (pooled OR= 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.20).

conclusionKRAS mutation is a predictor for the poor prognosis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer, but it is not related to the responses of tumors after treatment.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Treatment OutcomeKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRASNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyOverall survivalProgression-free survivalRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.