ReviewDer Anaesthesist2021
[Comments on the German consensus statement on prehospital treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients under long-term treatment with novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC)].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Observational
- [Preclinical loading in patients with acute chest pain and acute coronary syndrome - PRELOAD survey].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
- [Stocked medications in emergency medical service vehicles staffed by physicians-is prehospital treatment according to current guidelines possible?]Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2022Article
- [85/f-Dysuria and macroscopic hematuria under oral anticoagulation : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 118].Der Internist · 2022Article
- [Comments on the German consensus statement on prehospital treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients under long-term treatment with novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC)].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite an increasing number of patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome under novel oral anticoagulant therapy, specific treatment recommendations for anticoagulation are still lacking. For this reason, the German Society of Cardiology and the German Association of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine developed a consensus statement for the treatment of these patients with the aim to summarize the current evidence and to increase the safety of this special patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.