Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Patient feedback surveys among pregnant women in Eswatini to improve antenatal care retention.

Chloe A Teasdale, Amanda Geller, Siphesihle Shongwe, Arnold Mafukidze, Michelle Choy, Bhekinkhosi Magaula, Katharine Yuengling, Katherine King, Eduarda Pimentel De Gusmao, Caroline Ryan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chloe A TeasdaleDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-8972
Amanda GellerUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Siphesihle ShongweMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Arnold MafukidzeMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Michelle ChoyMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Bhekinkhosi MagaulaMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Katharine YuenglingMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Katherine KingNYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, NYC Health Training-Clinical Operations and Technical Assistance Program, New York, NY, United States of America.
Eduarda Pimentel De GusmaoMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Caroline RyanUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Trong AoUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Tegan CallahanUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Surbhi ModiUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-672X
Elaine J AbramsMailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Columbia University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Health · SZNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH000994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake and retention in antenatal care (ANC) is critical for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants.

methodsWe implemented a rapid quality improvement project to improve ANC retention at seven health facilities in Eswatini (October-December 2017). All pregnant women attending ANC visits were eligible to participate in anonymous tablet-based audio assisted computer self-interview (ACASI) surveys. The 24-question survey asked about women's interactions with health facility staff (HFS) (nurses, mentor mothers, receptionists and lab workers) with a three-level symbolic response options (agree/happy, neutral, disagree/sad). Women were asked to self-report HIV status. Survey results were shared with HFS at monthly quality improvement sessions. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in responses between months one and three, and between HIV-positive and negative women. Routine medical record data were used to compare retention among pregnant women newly enrolled in ANC two periods, January-February 2017 ('pre-period') and January-February 2018 ('post-period') at two of the participating health facilities. Proportions of women retained at 3 and 6 months were compared using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Wilcoxon tests.

resultsA total of 1,483 surveys were completed by pregnant women attending ANC, of whom 508 (34.3%) self-reported to be HIV-positive. The only significant change in responses from month one to three was whether nurses listened with agreement increasing from 88.3% to 94.8% (p<0.01). Overall, WLHIV had significantly higher proportions of reported satisfaction with HFS interactions compared to HIV-negative women. A total of 680 pregnant women were included in the retention analysis; 454 (66.8%) HIV-negative and 226 (33.2%) WLHIV. In the pre- and post-periods, 59.4% and 64.6%, respectively, attended at least four ANC visits (p = 0.16). The proportion of women retained at six months increased from 60.9% in the pre-period to 72.7% in the post-period (p = 0.03). For HIV-negative women, pre- and post-period six-month retention significantly increased from 56.6% to 71.6% (p = 0.02); however, the increase in WLHIV retained at six months from 70.7% (pre-period) to 75.0% (post-period) was not statistically significant (p = 0.64).

conclusionThe type of rapid quality improvement intervention we implemented may be useful in improving patient-provider relationships although whether it can improve retention remains unclear.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesEswatiniFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareRetention in CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33760864
PMCPMC7990172
OpenAlexW3139351634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.