Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760848›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Seasonality, climate change, and food security during pregnancy among Indigenous and non-Indigenous women in rural Uganda: Implications for maternal-infant health.

Julia M Bryson, Kaitlin Patterson, Lea Berrang-Ford, Shuaib Lwasa, Didacus B Namanya, Sabastian Twesigomwe, Charity Kesande, James D Ford, Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change Research Team, Sherilee L Harper

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia M BrysonDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7016-8771
Kaitlin PattersonDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Lea Berrang-FordPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Shuaib LwasaDepartment of Geography, Geo-Informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Didacus B NamanyaDepartment of Community Health, Ugandan Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Sabastian TwesigomweBatwa Development Program, Buhoma, Uganda.
Charity KesandeBatwa Development Program, Buhoma, Uganda.
James D FordPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-3456
Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change Research Team
Sherilee L HarperDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-8765

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change is expected to decrease food security globally. Many Indigenous communities have heightened sensitivity to climate change and food insecurity for multifactorial reasons including close relationships with the local environment and socioeconomic inequities which increase exposures and challenge adaptation to climate change. Pregnant women have additional sensitivity to food insecurity, as antenatal undernutrition is linked with poor maternal-infant health. This study examined pathways through which climate change influenced food security during pregnancy among Indigenous and non-Indigenous women in rural Uganda. Specific objectives were to characterize: 1) sensitivities to climate-associated declines in food security for pregnant Indigenous women; 2) women's perceptions of climate impacts on food security during pregnancy; and 3) changes in food security and maternal-infant health over time, as observed by women.

methodsUsing a community-based research approach, we conducted eight focus group discussions-four in Indigenous Batwa communities and four in non-Indigenous communities-in Kanungu District, Uganda, on the subject of climate and food security during pregnancy. Thirty-six women with ≥1 pregnancy participated. Data were analysed using a constant comparative method and thematic analysis.

resultsWomen indicated that food insecurity was common during pregnancy and had a bidirectional relationship with antenatal health issues. Food security was thought to be decreasing due to weather changes including extended droughts and unpredictable seasons harming agriculture. Women linked food insecurity with declines in maternal-infant health over time, despite improved antenatal healthcare. While all communities described food security struggles, the challenges Indigenous women identified and described were more severe.

conclusionsPrograms promoting women's adaptive capacity to climate change are required to improve food security for pregnant women and maternal-infant health. These interventions are particularly needed in Indigenous communities, which often face underlying health inequities. However, resiliency among mothers was strong and, with supports, they can reduce food security challenges in a changing climate.

Indexed as

AdultClimate ChangeFemaleFocus GroupsFood SecurityFood SupplyHumansIndigenous PeoplesInfantInfant HealthMalnutritionMaternal HealthMothersPregnancyRural PopulationSeasons

Identifiers

PMID33760848
PMCPMC7990176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.