Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760843›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Co-application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer reduced nitrogen losses from soil.

Xiuwen Li, Sutie Xu, Avishesh Neupane, Nourredine Abdoulmoumine, Jennifer M DeBruyn, Forbes R Walker, Sindhu Jagadamma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiuwen LiDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Sutie XuDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Avishesh NeupaneDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Nourredine AbdoulmoumineDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Jennifer M DeBruynDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-4144
Forbes R WalkerDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Sindhu JagadammaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-3308
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined application of biochar and nitrogen (N) fertilizer has the potential to reduce N losses from soil. However, the effectiveness of biochar amendment on N management can vary with biochar types with different physical and chemical properties. This study aimed to assess the effect of two types of hardwood biochar with different ash contents and cation exchange capacity (CEC) on soil N mineralization and nitrous oxide (N2O) production when applied alone and in combination with N fertilizer. Soil samples collected from a temperate pasture system were amended with two types of biochar (B1 and B2), urea, and urea plus biochar, and incubated for 60 days along with soil control (without biochar or urea addition). Soil nitrate N, ammonium N, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria amoA gene transcripts, and N2O production were measured during the experiment. Compared to control, addition of B1 (higher CEC and lower ash content) alone decreased nitrate N concentration by 21% to 45% during the incubation period while the addition of B2 (lower CEC and higher ash content) alone increased the nitrate N concentration during the first 10 days. Biochar B1 also reduced the abundance of amoA transcripts by 71% after 60 days. Compared to B1 + urea, B2 + urea resulted in a significantly greater initial increase in soil ammonium and nitrate N concentrations. However, B2 + urea had a significantly lower 60-day cumulative N2O emission compared to B1 + urea. Overall, when applied with urea, the biochar with higher CEC reduced ammonification and nitrification rates, while biochar with higher ash content reduced N N2O production. Our study demonstrated that biochar has the potential to enhance N retention in soil and reduce N2O emission when it is applied with urea, but the specific effects of the added biochar depend on its physical and chemical properties.

Indexed as

CharcoalAgricultureFertilizersNitrogenSoilbiocharCharcoalFertilizersNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID33760843
PMCPMC7990209
OpenAlexW3137358720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.