Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760816›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Chagas disease screening in pregnant Latin American women: Adherence to a systematic screening protocol in a non-endemic country.

Jara Llenas-García, Philip Wikman-Jorgensen, Concepción Gil-Anguita, Violeta Ramos-Sesma, Diego Torrús-Tendero, Raquel Martínez-Goñi, Mónica Romero-Nieto, Javier García-Abellán, María José Esteban-Giner, Karenina Antelo and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Chagas Disease in Europe.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Is It Possible to Intervene in the Capacity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jara Llenas-GarcíaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9125-7706
Philip Wikman-JorgensenFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6329-0311
Concepción Gil-AnguitaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain.
Violeta Ramos-SesmaInternal Medicine Service, HLA Inmaculada Hospital, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-6700
Diego Torrús-TenderoReference Unit of Imported Diseases and International Health, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
Raquel Martínez-GoñiInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital Vinalopó, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-0536
Mónica Romero-NietoFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Javier García-AbellánFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
María José Esteban-GinerInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-8089
Karenina AnteloInternal Medicine Department, Denia Hospital, Denia, Spain.
María Navarro-CotsFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-1505
Fernando BuñuelFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Concepción AmadorInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-8624
Josefa García-GarcíaInternal Medicine Department, Torrevieja University Hospital, Torrevieja, Spain.
Isabel GascónFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Guillermo TelentiFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1571-6090
Encarna Fuentes-CamposMicrobiology Department, Hospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2783-0066
Ignacio TorresMicrobiology Department, Denia Hospital, Denia, Spain.
Adelina Gimeno-GascónBiomedical and Health Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3728-3182
María Montserrat Ruíz-GarcíaFoundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Miriam NavarroDepartment of Public Health, Science History and Gynaecology, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-1587
José-Manuel Ramos-RincónClinical Medicine Department, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-9867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease (CD) is a chronic parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi and is endemic to continental Latin America. In Spain, the main transmission route is congenital. We aimed to assess adherence to regional recommendations of universal screening for CD during pregnancy in Latin American women in the province of Alicante from 2014 to 2018. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsRetrospective quality study using two data sources: 1) delivery records of Latin American women that gave birth in the 10 public hospitals of Alicante between January 2014 and December 2018; and 2) records of Chagas serologies carried out in those centers between May 2013 and December 2018. There were 3026 deliveries in Latin American women during the study period; 1178 (38.9%) underwent CD serology. Screening adherence ranged from 17.2% to 59.3% in the different health departments and was higher in Bolivian women (48.3%). Twenty-six deliveries (2.2%) had a positive screening; CD was confirmed in 23 (2%) deliveries of 21 women. Bolivians had the highest seroprevalence (21/112; 18.7%), followed by Colombians (1/333; 0.3%) and Ecuadorians (1/348; 0.3%). Of 21 CD-positive women (19 Bolivians, 1 Colombian, 1 Ecuadorian), infection was already known in 12 (57.1%), and 9 (42.9%) had already been treated. Only 1 of the 12 untreated women (8.3%) was treated postpartum. Follow-up started in 20 of the 23 (87.0%) neonates but was completed only in 11 (47.8%); no cases of congenital transmission were detected. Among the 1848 unscreened deliveries, we estimate 43 undiagnosed cases of CD and 1 to 2 undetected cases of congenital transmission. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Adherence to recommendations of systematic screening for CD in Latin American pregnant women in Alicante can be improved. Strategies to strengthen treatment of postpartum women and monitoring of exposed newborns are needed. Currently, there may be undetected cases of congenital transmission in our province.

Indexed as

Central AmericaChagas DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticRetrospective StudiesSeroepidemiologic StudiesSouth AmericaTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID33760816
PMCPMC8021187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.