Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760383›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2021

Prognostic significance of the HFA-PEFF score in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Yohei Sotomi, Katsuomi Iwakura, Shungo Hikoso, Koichi Inoue, Toshinari Onishi, Masato Okada, Kenshi Fujii, Atsunori Okamura, Shunsuke Tamaki, Masamichi Yano and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yohei SotomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuomi IwakuraDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shungo HikosoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koichi InoueDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Toshinari OnishiDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masato OkadaDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kenshi FujiiDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Atsunori OkamuraDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shunsuke TamakiDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masamichi YanoDivision of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takaharu HayashiCardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Akito NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Yusuke NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Kawanishi City Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Daisaku NakataniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshio YasumuraDivision of Cardiology, Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Takahisa YamadaDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
OCVC-Heart Failure Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe HFA-PEFF score is a part of the stepwise diagnostic algorithm of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the HFA-PEFF score on the clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND

resultsThe Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study in which collaborating hospitals in Osaka record clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data of patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) [UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000021831]. Acute decompensated heart failure was diagnosed on the basis of the following criteria: (i) clinical symptoms and signs according to the Framingham Heart Study criteria; and (ii) serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of ≥400 pg/mL or brain natriuretic peptide level of ≥100 pg/mL. The HFA-PEFF score has functional, morphological, and biomarker domains. We evaluated the prognostic significance of the HFA-PEFF score (calculated based on the data at hospital discharge) on post-discharge clinical outcomes in this cohort. The primary endpoint of the present study was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure readmission. Between June 2016 and December 2019, 871 patients were enrolled from 26 hospitals (mean follow-up duration 399 ± 349 days). A total of 804 patients were finally analysed after excluding patients with scores of 0 (N = 5) and 1 (N = 15) from 824 patients with available HFA-PEFF score based on the echocardiographic and laboratory data at discharge. According to the laboratory and echocardiographic data at the time of discharge, 487 patients (59.1%) were diagnosed as HFpEF (HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5) while 317 patients (38.5%) had intermediate score. Kaplan-Meier analysis divided by the HFA-PEFF score [low, score 2-5 (N = 494) vs. high, score 6 (N = 310)] indicated that the HFA-PEFF score successfully stratified the patients for the primary endpoint (log-rank test P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard model showed that the HFA-PEFF score was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (high score with reference to low score, adjusted hazard ratio 1.446, 95% confidence interval [1.099-1.902], P = 0.008).

conclusionThe HFA-PEFF score at discharge was significantly associated with the post-discharge clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. This study suggested clinical usefulness of the HFA-PEFF score not only as a diagnostic tool but also a practical prognostic tool.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAftercareHumansPatient DischargePrognosisProspective StudiesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftHFA-PEFF scoreHFpEF

Identifiers

PMID33760383
PMCPMC8120389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.