Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33760091›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Outcome Goals and Health Care Preferences of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Mary E Tinetti, Darcé M Costello, Aanand D Naik, Claire Davenport, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos, Julia R Van Liew, Jessica Esterson, Eliza Kiwak, Lilian Dindo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05303194 (Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05303194 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled21ConditionsMultiple Chronic Conditions, DementiaArmsPatient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach, Adapted PPC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary E TinettiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Darcé M CostelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Aanand D NaikCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Claire DavenportBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Kizzy Hernandez-BigosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Julia R Van LiewDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, Medical Humanities, and Bioethics, Des Moines University, Des Moines, Iowa.
Jessica EstersonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Eliza KiwakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lilian DindoCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) vary in their health outcome goals and the health care that they prefer to receive to achieve these goals. Objective: To describe the outcome goals and health care preferences of this population with MCCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included participants in the Patient Priorities Care study who underwent health priorities identification from February 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018, in a primary care practice. Patients eligible to participate were 65 years or older, English speaking, and had at least 3 chronic conditions; in addition, they used at least 10 medications, saw at least 2 specialists, or had at least 2 emergency department visits or 1 hospitalization during the past year. Of 236 eligible patients, 163 (69%) agreed to participate in this study. Data were analyzed from August 1 to October 31, 2020. Exposures: Guided by facilitators, participants identified their core values, as many as 3 actionable and realistic outcome goals, health-related barriers to these goals, and as many as 3 helpful and 3 bothersome health care activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies were ascertained for outcome goals and health care preferences. Preferences included health care activities (medications, health care visits, procedures, diagnostic tests, and self-management) reported as either helpful or bothersome. Results: Most of the 163 participants were White (158 [96.9%]) and women (109 [66.9%]), with a mean (SD) age of 77.6 (7.6) years. Of 459 goals, the most common encompassed meals and other activities with family and friends (111 [24.2%]), shopping (28 [6.1%]), and exercising (21 [4.6%]). Twenty individuals (12.3%) desired to live independently without specifying necessary activities. Of 312 barriers identified, the most common were pain (128 [41.0%]), fatigue (45 [14.4%]), unsteadiness (42 [13.5%]), and dyspnea (19 [6.1%]). Similar proportions of patients identified at least 1 medication that was helpful (130 [79.8%]) or bothersome (128 [78.5%]). Medications most commonly cited as helpful were pain medications, including nonopiods (36 of 55 users [65.5%]) and opioids (15 of 27 users [55.6%]); sleep medications (27 of 51 users [52.9%]); and respiratory inhalants (19 of 45 [42.2%]). Most often mentioned as bothersome were statins (25 of 97 users [25.8%]) and antidepressants (13 of 40 users [32.5%]). Thirty-two participants (19.6%) reported using too many medications. Health care visits were identified as helpful by 43 participants (26.4%); 15 (9.2%) reported too many visits. Procedures were named helpful by 38 participants (23.3%); 24 (14.7%) cited unwanted procedures. Among 48 participants with diabetes, monitoring of glucose levels was doable for 18 (37.5%) and too bothersome for 9 (18.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Participants identified realistic and actionable goals while varying in health care activities deemed helpful or bothersome. The goals and health care preferences of more diverse populations must be explored. Previous work suggests that clinicians can use this information in decision-making.

Indexed as

GoalsPatient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMultiple Chronic ConditionsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33760091
PMCPMC7991967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.