ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2021
Invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Illness–Proposed Indications and Approaches.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of stellate ganglion modulation in mental disorders and the future prospects of physical therapies.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Based Neural Interfaces for Recording and Stimulation: Fundamental Aspects and In Vivo Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrugs, psychotherapy, and other treatment modalities are effective for many patients with mental illness. Nonetheless, many patients do not achieve a total remission with the currently available interventions, and the recurrence rates are high. As part of the ongoing search for further treatment options for refractory disorders, there is renewed interest in focal neuromodulatory techniques, including invasive ones, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in particular.
methodsIn this review article, a group consisting of neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, and one practicing ethicist/neurologist summarizes the main aspects of the use of DBS to treat mental illness and offers recommendations on its indications and practical implementation.
resultsThe efficacy of DBS against mental illness has not been confirmed in the randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that have been published to date. This may be because the follow-up times were too short. In contrast to the negative RCTs, case series have indeed shown a positive effect of DBS on severe depression, but this effect can only be seen several months after the operation.
conclusionDBS may be a therapeutic option for selected patients with otherwise intractable mental illness. Patients should only be treated in the setting of clinical trials. RCTs with longer follow-up times must be conducted in order to substantiate, if possible, the promising evidence that has been found in case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.