Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33759250›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of emodepside, a potential novel treatment for onchocerciasis (river blindness), in healthy male subjects.

Jean-Yves Gillon, Jeremy Dennison, Frans van den Berg, Sophie Delhomme, Karen Dequatre Cheeseman, Claudia Peña Rossi, Nathalie Strub Wourgaft, Sabine Specht, Belén Pedrique, Frédéric Monnot and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Deep phenotypic profiling uncovers cryptic effects of antifilarial drugs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Differential Emodepside Efficacy in Drug-Resistant and Drug-SusceptibleTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Yves GillonDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-0403
Jeremy DennisonHammersmith Medicines Research Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0063-0614
Frans van den BergHammersmith Medicines Research Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-3910
Sophie DelhommeDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Karen Dequatre CheesemanDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Claudia Peña RossiDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie Strub WourgaftDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9915-6934
Sabine SpechtDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5351-5812
Belén PedriqueDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Frédéric MonnotDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Susanne SkrabsBayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Maria-Luisa RodriguezBayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Heino StassBayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHBayer (Germany) · DEHammersmith Hospital · GBHammersmith Medicines Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEmodepside is an anthelmintic, originally developed for veterinary use. We investigated in healthy subjects the safety, and pharmacokinetics of a liquid service formulation (LSF) and immediate release (IR) tablet of emodepside in 2 randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, Phase I studies.

methodsSeventy-nine subjects in 10 cohorts in the single ascending dose study and 24 subjects in 3 ascending-dose cohorts in the multiple ascending dose study were enrolled. Emodepside as LSF was administered orally as single 1-40-mg doses and for 10 days as 5 or 10 mg once daily and 10-mg twice daily doses, respectively. Pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed up to 21 and 30 days, respectively. In addition, IR tablets containing 5 or 20 mg emodepside were tested in the single ascending dose study.

resultsEmodepside as LSF was rapidly absorbed under fasting conditions, with dose-proportional increase in plasma concentrations at doses from 1 to 40 mg. Terminal half-life was > 500 hours. In the fed state, emodepside was absorbed more slowly but overall plasma exposure was not significantly affected. Compared to the LSF, the rate and extent of absorption was significantly lower with the tablets.

conclusionsOverall, emodepside had acceptable safety and tolerability profiles, no major safety concerns, after single oral administration of 20 mg as LSF and after multiple oral administration over 10 days at 5 and 10 mg OD and at 10 mg twice daily. For further clinical trials, the development of a tablet formulation overcoming the limitations observed in the present study with the IR tablet formulation is considered.

Indexed as

OnchocerciasisOnchocerciasis, OcularAdministration, OralArea Under CurveDepsipeptidesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFood-Drug InteractionsHalf-LifeHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleDepsipeptidesemodepsideemodepsidehealthy subjectsonchocerciasispharmacokineticsriver blindnesssafety

Identifiers

PMID33759250
PMCPMC8518114
OpenAlexW3138989640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.