ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Facial expressions can be categorized along the upper-lower facial axis, from a perceptual perspective.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A critical question, fundamental for building models of emotion, is how to categorize emotions. Previous studies have typically taken one of two approaches: (a) they focused on the pre-perceptual visual cues, how salient facial features or configurations were displayed; or (b) they focused on the post-perceptual affective experiences, how emotions affected behavior. In this study, we attempted to group emotions at a peri-perceptual processing level: it is well known that humans perceive different facial expressions differently, therefore, can we classify facial expressions into distinct categories in terms of their perceptual similarities? Here, using a novel non-lexical paradigm, we assessed the perceptual dissimilarities between 20 facial expressions using reaction times. Multidimensional-scaling analysis revealed that facial expressions were organized predominantly along the upper-lower face axis. Cluster analysis of behavioral data delineated three superordinate categories, and eye-tracking measurements validated these clustering results. Interestingly, these superordinate categories can be conceptualized according to how facial displays interact with acoustic communications: One group comprises expressions that have salient mouth features. They likely link to species-specific vocalization, for example, crying, laughing. The second group comprises visual displays with diagnosing features in both the mouth and the eye regions. They are not directly articulable but can be expressed prosodically, for example, sad, angry. Expressions in the third group are also whole-face expressions but are completely independent of vocalization, and likely being blends of two or more elementary expressions. We propose a theoretical framework to interpret the tripartite division in which distinct expression subsets are interpreted as successive phases in an evolutionary chain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33759116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.