SynthesisUpdates in surgery2021
Meta-analysis of mesh-plug repair and Lichtenstein repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of open partial preperitoneal tension-free repair for inguinal hernia following radical prostatectomy: a single-center retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Risk of adverse outcomes by plug and flat mesh following 90,319 open inguinal hernia repairs.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Physiologic Cyclical Load on Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor Turns Biological Response into Tissue Regeneration.Biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study systematically evaluated the clinical effects of mesh-plug and Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (cut-off: May 25, 2020) databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mesh-plug and Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were screened and evaluated for quality. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform a meta-analysis of operation time, discomfort in the inguinal region, haematoma, seroma, infection, time to return to normal activities, incidence of postoperative chronic pain, and recurrence rate. Eleven RCTs with 1457 patients in the mesh-plug group and 1472 in the Lichtenstein group were included. Meta-analysis showed that the mesh-plug herniorrhaphy group had a shorter operation time than the Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy group [P < 0.0001] but a longer time to return to normal activities after surgery [MD = 1.48, 95% CI (0.58, 2.38), P = 0.001]. There were no significant differences in postoperative discomfort in the inguinal region [P = 0.90], seroma [P = 0.10], haematoma [P = 0.27], infection [P = 0.40], incidence of postoperative chronic pain [P = 0.90], or recurrence rate [P = 0.77] between groups. Mesh-plug herniorrhaphy requires a shorter operation time than Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy, and there is no significant difference in postoperative complications or recurrence rate between the two methods. Clinical trial registration: INPLASY202070088. Meta-analysis of mesh -plug repair and Lichtenstein repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.