ArticleOdontology2021
Effects of porcelain veneering methods on conformity of the marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia framework.
Article in Odontology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of porcelain veneering methods on the marginal and internal fit of a three-unit zirconia framework. A zirconia master model, in which the lower-left second premolar and the second left molar were used as the abutment, was obtained using an intraoral scanner. Based on the data, three-unit zirconia frameworks for fabricating all-ceramic bridges were designed and milled (FW group). Two types of all-ceramic bridge were fabricated by veneering porcelain onto these frameworks using the press-over technique (P group) and the layering technique (L group). The replica technique was used to measure the gap size between the abutments and the bridges. Measurements were taken in the marginal opening area (MO), chamfer area (CH), axial area (AX), and occlusal area (OC). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. There was no significant difference in MO and CH between the P and L groups. However, in AX, the L group had a significantly larger gap size than that of the P group (p = 0.003). In addition, compared with the FW group, the P group showed a significantly larger gap size in MO (p < 0.000), CH (p = 0.008), and OC (p < 0.000). These results indicate that the gap size increased after porcelain veneering using the press-over and layering techniques. In addition, the all-ceramic bridges fabricated using the press-over and layering techniques had approximately equal gap sizes in MO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.