ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Macular pigment optical density change analysis in primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macular pigment optical density and measurement technology based on artificial intelligence: a narrative review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to investigate whether macular pigment optical density (MPOD) has a diagnostic value by comparing MPOD and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer++ (GCL++) of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation (PEX) glaucoma and normal individuals.
methodsWe included in the study 54 eyes of 34 patients with diagnosis POAG, 40 eyes of 25 patients with PEX glaucoma and 40 eyes of 20 normal individuals. The MPOD measurements of the cases were performed in the MPOD mode of the fundus fluorescein angiography (Carl Zeiss Visucam Meditec, Germany) device while the pupils were in dilated status. RNFL and GCL++ measurements of all individuals included in the study were done by swept source optical coherence tomography (DRI Triton swept source optical coherence tomography; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). Intraocular pressures of all three groups were measured by Applanation tonometer. The relationship between MPOD, RNFL and GCL++ values were examined. Patients with additional ophthalmic disease, intraocular surgery, history of chronic drug use, and smokers were excluded in the study.
resultsMPOD mean and MPOD max values were significantly higher in patients with PEX glaucoma than POAG and control group (p < 0.05). MPOD mean and MPOD max measurements were not different when compared to POAG patients and control group (p > 0.05). RNFL and GCL++ measurements were found significantly thinner in patients with POAG and PEX glaucoma compared to the control group (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between MPOD values and RNFL or GCL++. MPOD max values show a very high correlation with age in a statistically significant positive direction (r = 0.90, p < 0.001). The average age of PEX glaucoma group was higher than the control group (p = 0.006). There was no age difference between the PEX glaucoma group and the POAG group (p > 0.05). Also, there was no difference in age between POAG and control groups. In POAG and PEX glaucoma groups, mean intraocular pressure values are significantly higher than the control group.
conclusionsIn our study, no MPOD change was observed in the POAG group, while a statistically significant increase in MPOD was found in the PEX glaucoma group. As a result of these findings, we think that PEX syndrome also affects the posterior segment. Well-organized, large, prospective, and randomized studies should be developed for preventive treatment to the negative effects of PEX syndrome on all eye tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.