Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33759063›Full record

ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2021

CAR T cell therapy as a promising approach in cancer immunotherapy: challenges and opportunities.

Maryam Akhoundi, Mahsa Mohammadi, Seyedeh Saeideh Sahraei, Mohsen Sheykhhasan, Nashmin Fayazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: Beyond Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Cell therapy in pediatric blood diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam Akhoundi *Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa Mohammadi *Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Seyedeh Saeideh SahraeiDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Mohsen SheykhhasanResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. mohsen.sh2009@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-2278
Nashmin FayaziResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRRoyan Institute · IRAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cell therapy has shown great potential in the immunotherapy of patients with hematologic malignancies. In spite of this striking achievement, there are still major challenges to overcome in CAR T cell therapy of solid tumors, including treatment-related toxicity and specificity. Also, other obstacles may be encountered in tackling solid tumors, such as their immunosuppressive microenvironment, the heterogeneous expression of cell surface markers, and the cumbersome arrival of T cells at the tumor site. Although several strategies have been developed to overcome these challenges, aditional research aimed at enhancing its efficacy with minimum side effects, the design of precise yet simplified work flows and the possibility to scale-up production with reduced costs and related risks is still warranted.

conclusionsHere, we review main strategies to establish a balance between the toxicity and activity of CAR T cells in order to enhance their specificity and surpass immunosuppression. In recent years, many clinical studies have been conducted that eventually led to approved products. To date, the FDA has approved two anti-CD19 CAR T cell products for non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy, i.e., axicbtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. With all the advances that have been made in the field of CAR T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies therapy, ongoing studies are focused on optimizing its efficacy and specificity, as well as reducing the side effects. Also, the efforts are poised to broaden CAR T cell therapeutics for other cancers, especially solid tumors.

Indexed as

HumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive cell transferCancerCAR T cell therapyImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33759063
PMCPMC12980761
OpenAlexW3126332167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.