Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33758997›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Radiomics MRI for lymph node status prediction in breast cancer patients: the state of art.

Alessandro Calabrese, Domiziana Santucci, Roberta Landi, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Eliodoro Faiella, Carlo de Felice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis using a magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model of invasive breast cancer primary tumor.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro CalabreseDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155 00161, Rome, RM, Italy.
Domiziana SantucciDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21 00128, Rome, Italy. d.santucci@unicampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-8715
Roberta LandiDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21 00128, Rome, Italy.
Bruno Beomonte ZobelDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21 00128, Rome, Italy.
Eliodoro FaiellaDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-6891
Carlo de FeliceDepartment of Radiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155 00161, Rome, RM, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo create a review of the existing literature on the radiomic approach in predicting the lymph node status of the axilla in breast cancer (BC). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo reviewers conducted the literature search on MEDLINE databases independently. Ten articles on the prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with a radiomic approach were selected. The study characteristics and results were reported. The quality of the methodology was evaluated according to the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS).

resultsAll studies were retrospective in design and published between 2017 and 2020. The majority of studies used DCE-MRI sequences and two investigated only pre-contrast images. The sample size was lower than 200 patients for 7 studies. The pre-processing used software, feature extraction and selection methods and classifier development are heterogeneous and a standardization of results is not yet possible. The average RQS score was 11.1 (maximum possible value = 36). The criteria with the lowest scores were the type of study, validation, comparison with a gold standard, potential clinical utility, cost-effective analysis and open science data.

conclusionThe field of radiomics is a diagnostic approach of relative recent development. The results in predicting axillary lymph node status are encouraging, but there are still weaknesses in the quality of studies that may limit the reproducibility of the results.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph NodeAdultAxillaBreast NeoplasmsDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhenotypeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerLymph node statusMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID33758997
PMCPMC11801989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.