Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33758926›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

SBGN Bricks Ontology as a tool to describe recurring concepts in molecular networks.

Adrien Rougny, Vasundra Touré, John Albanese, Dagmar Waltemath, Denis Shirshov, Anatoly Sorokin, Gary D Bader, Michael L Blinov, Alexander Mazein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. momapy: a Python library to work with molecular maps.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BioKC: a collaborative platform for curation and annotation of molecular interactions.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrien RougnyBiotechnology Research Institute for Drug Discovery, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Aomi, Tokyo, Japan.
Vasundra TouréNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 5, Realfagbygget, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
John AlbaneseR. D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Dagmar WaltemathMedical Informatics Laboratory, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Denis ShirshovEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine, CIRI UMR5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Université de Lyon, 50 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007 Lyon, France.
Anatoly SorokinInstitute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 Institutskaya Street, Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia.
Gary D BaderThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, M5S 3E1, Toronto, Canada.
Michael L BlinovR. D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Alexander MazeinEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine, CIRI UMR5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Université de Lyon, 50 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007 Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensible representation of a molecular network is key to communicating and understanding scientific results in systems biology. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) has emerged as the main standard to represent such networks graphically. It has been implemented by different software tools, and is now largely used to communicate maps in scientific publications. However, learning the standard, and using it to build large maps, can be tedious. Moreover, SBGN maps are not grounded on a formal semantic layer and therefore do not enable formal analysis. Here, we introduce a new set of patterns representing recurring concepts encountered in molecular networks, called SBGN bricks. The bricks are structured in a new ontology, the Bricks Ontology (BKO), to define clear semantics for each of the biological concepts they represent. We show the usefulness of the bricks and BKO for both the template-based construction and the semantic annotation of molecular networks. The SBGN bricks and BKO can be freely explored and downloaded at sbgnbricks.org.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalSoftwareComputer GraphicsGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHumansInsulinInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein IsoformsReceptors, SomatomedinSignal TransductionSomatomedinsSystems BiologyInsulinInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsIRS1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein IsoformsReceptors, SomatomedinSomatomedinsannotationmolecular networkontologySystems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN)template-based constructionvisualisation

Identifiers

PMID33758926
PMCPMC8425392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.