ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021
Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing drug discovery from natural products: The roles of artificial intelligence and multi-omics in accelerating innovation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Auxiliary Discrminator Sequence Generative Adversarial Networks for Few Sample Molecule Generation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- A Full-Spectrum Generative Lead Discovery (FSGLD) Pipeline via DRUG-GAN: A Multiscale Method for Drug-like/Target-specific Compound Library Generation.Research square · 2025Article
- Advancing promiscuous aggregating inhibitor analysis with intelligent machine learning classification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Novel target identification towards drug repurposing based on biological activity profiles.PloS one · 2025Article
- Geometry Optimization Algorithms in Conjunction with the Machine Learning Potential ANI-2x Facilitate the Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Binding Mode Prediction.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- GSScore: a novel Graphormer-based shell-like scoring method for protein-ligand docking.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- In Silico Screening of Natural Flavonoids against 3-Chymotrypsin-like Protease of SARS-CoV-2 Using Machine Learning and Molecular Modeling.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Discovery of Potent and Selective CB2 Agonists Utilizing a Function-Based Computational Screening Protocol.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Structure-based protein-ligand interaction fingerprints for binding affinity prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structure-based virtual screenings (SBVSs) play an important role in drug discovery projects. However, it is still a challenge to accurately predict the binding affinity of an arbitrary molecule binds to a drug target and prioritize top ligands from an SBVS. In this study, we developed a novel method, using ligand-residue interaction profiles (IPs) to construct machine learning (ML)-based prediction models, to significantly improve the screening performance in SBVSs. Such a kind of the prediction model is called an IP scoring function (IP-SF). We systematically investigated how to improve the performance of IP-SFs from many perspectives, including the sampling methods before interaction energy calculation and different ML algorithms. Using six drug targets with each having hundreds of known ligands, we conducted a critical evaluation on the developed IP-SFs. The IP-SFs employing a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm in conjunction with the MIN + GB simulation protocol achieved the best overall performance. Its scoring power, ranking power and screening power significantly outperformed the Glide SF. First, compared with Glide, the average values of mean absolute error and root mean square error of GBDT/MIN + GB decreased about 38 and 36%, respectively. Second, the mean values of squared correlation coefficient and predictive index increased about 225 and 73%, respectively. Third, more encouragingly, the average value of the areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic for six targets by GBDT, 0.87, is significantly better than that by Glide, which is only 0.71. Thus, we expected IP-SFs to have broad and promising applications in SBVSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.