Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33758874›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2021

Predicting the Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Donor Units with the Lumit Dx anti-Receptor Binding Domain Assay.

Sanath Kumar Janaka, Natasha M Clark, David T Evans, Joseph P Connor

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanath Kumar Janaka
Natasha M Clark
David T Evans
Joseph P Connor
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Sustained antibody delivery for durable suppression of immunodeficiency virus replicationR01AI121135 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI David T Evans · 2015 to 2026
$6.9M
KIR and MHC Class I Immunogenetics in SIV InfectionR37AI095098 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI David T Evans · 2019 to 2026
$5.6M
Harnessing adaptive NK cell transfer to deplete viral reservoirsR01AI161816 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARKER, EDWARD, EVANS, DAVID T · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121135NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI161816NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI095098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of more than 2.5 million people, but no cure exists. Although passive immunization with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) provides a safe and viable therapeutic option, the selection of optimal units for therapy in a timely fashion remains a barrier. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsSince virus neutralization is a necessary characteristic of plasma that can benefit recipients, the neutralizing titers of plasma samples were measured using a retroviral-pseudotype assay. Binding antibody titers to the spike (S) protein were also determined by a clinically available serological assay (Ortho-Vitros total IG), and an in-house ELISA. The results of these assays were compared to a measurement of antibodies directed to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 S protein (Promega Lumit Dx).

resultsAll measures of antibodies were highly variable, but correlated, to different degrees, with each other. However, the anti-RBD antibodies correlated with viral neutralizing titers to a greater extent than the other antibody assays. DISCUSSION: Our observations support the use of an anti-RBD assay such as the Lumit Dx assay, as an optimal predictor of the neutralization capability of CCP.

Identifiers

PMID33758874
PMCPMC7987033
OpenAlexW3134744114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.