ArticleCureus2021
Association of High Density Cholesterol With Hyperemic Epicardial Flow and Frame Count Reserve in Patients With Moderate Coronary Lesions and Slow Coronary Flow.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients with microvascular angina and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerotic disease have an elevated risk of adverse events and all-cause mortality compared with individuals without ischaemic heart disease. The diagnosis coronary microvascular dysfunction in this setting relies on the detection of impaired coronary flow at rest or on calculation of coronary flow reserve. Previous studies demonstrate that the coronary flow reserve assessed by the corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction method - the frame count reserve is an objective quantitative alternative to other widely used invasive methods for microvascular status evaluation. Purpose We assessed the significance of clinical, hemodynamic, angiographic variables and therapy with reference to FCR in a small group of patients with up to moderate atherosclerotic coronary lesions and slow coronary flow. Materials and methods: Frame count reserve was evaluated in 15 patients without flow-limiting (>50%) coronary stenoses admitted with unstable angina. Frame count reserve was calculated by dividing the baseline corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) by the cTFC assessed after intracoronary infusion of 100 µg of the calcium channel blocker - verapamil. Results The values of frame count reserve correlate positively with the levels of high density cholesterol (r= 0.900, p=0.001), inversely coronary flow after the application of verapamil - cTFCv (r= - 0.534, p=0.049). cTFCv was positively related with the levels of high density lipoproteins (r = - 0.645; p= 0.044) and was negatively influenced by the presence of atherosclerotic lesions at quantitative angiography (42.8±19.1 (n=8) vs 23±5.4 (n=7), p=0.029).The therapy with β-blocker and long-acting nitrate was associated with insignificantly higher frame count reserves after intracoronary verapamil compared to the continuous intake only of β-blocker or β-blocker and verapamil (2.1±0.78 vs 1.34±0.14 vs 1.70±0.70, p=NS). Conclusions Higher high-density lipoproteins relate to higher frame count reserves evaluated using verapamil. The improved blood flow after this microvascular vasodilator is consistently positively related to high-density cholesterol and the lack of atherosclerosis at conventional coronary angiography. The combined intake of micro- and macrovascular vasodilator could be associated with higher frame count reserves compared to therapy with β-blocker and one vasodilating drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.