Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33758680›Full record

ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2019

Heterogeneity of the Anxiety-Related Attention Bias: A Review and Working Model for Future Research.

Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary, Amy Krain Roy, Samantha Denefrio, Sarah Myruski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of attention bias modification for anxiety: Neurophysiological indices and moderation by symptom severity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Attention Bias and Recognition of Sexual Images in Depression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tracy A Dennis-TiwaryHunter College, The City University of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY.
Amy Krain RoyFordham University, Department of Psychology, Bronx, NY.
Samantha DenefrioThe Graduate Center, The City University of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY.
Sarah MyruskiHunter College, The City University of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
Neurobehavioral basis of attention bias heterogeneity in adolescent anxietyR56MH111700 · NIMH · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI DENNIS, TRACY A · 2017 to 2018
$1.6M
Attention Bias Modification for Anxiety: A Randomized Control Trial with BiomarkeSC1MH104907 · NIMH · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI DENNIS, TRACY A · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH111700NIMH NIH HHS SC1 MH104907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anxiety-related attention bias (AB) has been studied for several decades as a clinically-relevant output of the dynamic and complex threat detection-response system. Despite research enthusiasm for the construct of AB, current theories and measurement approaches cannot adequately account for the growing body of mixed, contradictory, and null findings. Drawing on clinical, neuroscience, and animal models, we argue that the apparent complexity and contradictions in the empirical literature can be attributed to the field's failure to clearly conceptualize AB heterogeneity and the dearth of studies in AB that consider additional cognitive mechanisms in anxiety, particularly disruptions in threat-safety discrimination and cognitive control. We review existing research and propose a working model of AB heterogeneity positing that AB may be best conceptualized as multiple subtypes of dysregulated processing of and attention to threat anchored in individual differences in threat-safety discrimination and cognitive control. We review evidence for this working model and discuss how it can be used to advance knowledge of AB mechanisms and inform personalized prevention and intervention approaches.

Indexed as

Anxietyattention biasindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID33758680
PMCPMC7983558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.