Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33757948›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Anticholinergic drug burden according to the anticholinergic drug scale and the German anticholinergic burden and their impact on cognitive function in multimorbid elderly German people: a multicentre observational study.

Caroline Krüger, Ingmar Schäfer, Hendrik van den Bussche, Horst Bickel, Angela Fuchs, Jochen Gensichen, Hans-Helmut König, Wolfgang Maier, Karola Mergenthal, Steffi G Riedel-Heller and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multimorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Neighborhood Disadvantage as Determinants of Cognitive Performance in the ARCHES Cohort.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline KrügerDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany c.krueger@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-1562
Ingmar SchäferDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-7478
Hendrik van den BusscheDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Horst BickelDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Angela FuchsInstitute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jochen GensichenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang MaierDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute for Social Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard SchönDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Siegfried WeyererDepartment of Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.
Birgitt WieseInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Wolfgang von Renteln-KruseDepartment of Research, Albertinen-Haus Zentrum fur Geriatrie und Gerontologie Medizinisch-Geriatrische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia LangebrakeDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEAlbertinen Diakoniewerk · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEJena University Hospital · DELeipzig University · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aims of our study were to examine the anticholinergic drug use and to assess the association between anticholinergic burden and cognitive function in the multimorbid elderly patients of the MultiCare cohort.

settingMultiCare was conducted as a longitudinal cohort study in primary care, located in eight different study centres in Germany.

participants3189 patients (59.3% female). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline data were used for the following analyses. Drugs were classified according to the well-established anticholinergic drug scale (ADS) and the recently published German anticholinergic burden (German ACB). Cognitive function was measured using a letter digit substitution test (LDST) and a mixed-effect multivariate linear regression was performed to calculate the influence of anticholinergic burden on the cognitive function.

resultsPatients used 1764 anticholinergic drugs according to ADS and 2750 anticholinergics according to the German ACB score (prevalence 38.4% and 53.7%, respectively). The mean ADS score was 0.8 (±1.3), and the mean German ACB score was 1.2 (±1.6) per patient. The most common ADS anticholinergic was furosemide (5.8%) and the most common ACB anticholinergic was metformin (13.7%). The majority of the identified anticholinergics were drugs with low anticholinergic potential: 80.2% (ADS) and 73.4% (ACB), respectively. An increasing ADS and German ACB score was associated with reduced cognitive function according to the LDST (-0.26; p=0.008 and -0.24; p=0.003, respectively).

conclusionMultimorbid elderly patients are in a high risk for using anticholinergic drugs according to ADS and German ACB score. We especially need to gain greater awareness for the contribution of drugs with low anticholinergic potential from the cardiovascular system. As anticholinergic drug use is associated with reduced cognitive function in multimorbid elderly patients, the importance of rational prescribing and also deprescribing needs to be further evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN89818205.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsPharmaceutical PreparationsAgedCognitionFemaleGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleCholinergic AntagonistsPharmaceutical Preparationsclinical pharmacologyepidemiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33757948
PMCPMC7993236
OpenAlexW3138461731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.