Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2021
Shoulder dystocia and composite adverse outcomes for the maternal-neonatal dyad.
Observational study in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Stuck in transition - admission to the neonatal intensive care unit after shoulder dystocia: analysis of risk factors and assessment of postnatal care.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Invisible Links: Associations Between Micronutrient Deficiencies and Postpartum Depression-A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- PREGNANCY DISORDERS AND MATERNAL CONSEQUENCES: Maternal pre-pregnancy risks and postpartum consequences of gestational diabetes.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Neonatal birth trauma: identifying new risk factors and short-term outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Survival analysis of under-five mortality and associated risk factors using survival analysis approaches.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Maternal and neonatal complications of shoulder dystocia with a focus on obstetric maneuvers: A case-control study of 1103 deliveries.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Sudden Collapse of a Newborn Infant Following Delivery Complicated by Shoulder Dystocia.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diagnosis, Prevention, Complications, Prognosis, and Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia: an analysis based on the scrutiny of 2274 deliveries.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Racial variations of adverse perinatal outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia are well known, the maternal morbidity caused by this obstetrical emergency is infrequently reported.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaginal deliveries (at 34 weeks or later) with and without shoulder dystocia. STUDY
designThis is a secondary analysis of the Consortium of Safe Labor, an observational obstetrical cohort of all vaginal deliveries occurring at 19 hospitals (from 2002-2008) and for which data on the occurrence of shoulder dystocia were available. The composite adverse maternal outcome included third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage (>500 cc blood loss for a vaginal delivery and >1000 cc blood loss for cesarean delivery), blood transfusion, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. The composite adverse neonatal outcome included an Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes, a birth injury, neonatal seizure, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, or neonatal death. A multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine if clinical factors would identify shoulder dystocia.
resultsOf the 228,438 women in the overall cohort, 130,008 (59.6%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, shoulder dystocia was documented in 2159 (1.7%) cases. The rate of composite maternal morbidity was significantly higher among deliveries with shoulder dystocia (14.7%) than without (8.6%; adjusted relative risk, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-2.01). The most common maternal morbidity with shoulder dystocia was a third- or fourth-degree laceration (adjusted relative risk, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.39-3.31). The risk of composite neonatal morbidity with shoulder dystocia (12.2%) was also significantly higher than without shoulder dystocia (2.4%) (adjusted relative risk, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.60-5.84). The most common neonatal morbidity was birth injury (adjusted relative risk, 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 4.71-6.17). The area under the curve for maternal characteristics to identify shoulder dystocia was 0.66 and it was 0.67 for intrapartum factors.
conclusionAlthough shoulder dystocia is unpredictable, the associated morbidity affects both mothers and newborns. The focus should be on concurrently averting the composite morbidity for the maternal-neonatal dyad with shoulder dystocia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.