Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33757651›Full record

SynthesisThe surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland2021

COVID-19 infection risk by open and laparoscopic surgical smoke: A systematic review of the literature.

Diandra Antunes, Mariam Lami, Agbim Chukwudi, Abhishek Dey, Mahul Patel, Amanda Shabana, Mohamed Shams, Zoe Slack, Giles Bond-Smith, Giovanni Tebala

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of gastrointestinal surgery.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diandra AntunesSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: diandra.antunes@ouh.nhs.uk.
Mariam LamiSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Agbim ChukwudiSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Abhishek DeySurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Mahul PatelSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Amanda ShabanaSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Mohamed ShamsSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Zoe SlackSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Giles Bond-SmithSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Giovanni TebalaSurgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current COVID-19 pandemic has greatly changed the way surgery is delivered. In particular, current guidelines and policies have highlighted the need to use high level Personal Protective Equipment to reduce the risk of viral infection during open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. In particular, it was felt that the laparoscopic approach was at higher risk of viral transmission due to the chimney effect of the smoke escape from the trocars during and after the procedure. However, with this being a new and largely unknown viral agent, guidelines have been based on speculation and extrapolation from previous studies conducted in completely different situations, and led to anxiety amongst surgeons and theatre staff. We decided to conduct a systematic review of the Literature to try to clarify whether inhalation of surgical smoke can increase the risk of COVID-19 infection.

methodsA thorough search of the relevant Literature was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and the most relevant papers on this topic were selected for qualitative analysis. Duplicates, review, personal opinions and guidelines have been excluded. Quantitative analysis has not been performed due to the lack of homogeneous high-quality studies.

resultsLiterature search identified 740 papers but only 34 of them were suitable for qualitative analysis. The quality of those studies is generally quite low. We were not able to find any evidence directly linking surgical smoke with viral transmission, other than in patients with active HPV infection. DISCUSSION: Inhalation of surgical smoke can be generally hazardous, and therefore the use of PPE during surgical operations must be recommended in any case. However, the present systematic review of the existent Literature did not identify any significant evidence of the risk of viral transmission with the surgical smoke, therefore the current guidelines restricting the use of laparoscopy and/or diathermy during the current Covid-19 pandemic may be considered excessive and non-evidence based.

Indexed as

COVID-19LaparoscopyHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SmokeSmokeCoronavirusCOVID-19InfectionRiskSurgerySurgical plumesSurgical smokeViral transmissionVirus

Identifiers

PMID33757651
PMCPMC7927587
OpenAlexW3135080772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.