Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33757461›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine and lockdown in South Africa: results from a rapid online survey.

Sibusiso Sifunda, Tholang Mokhele, Thabang Manyaapelo, Natisha Dukhi, Ronel Sewpaul, Whadi-Ah Parker, Saahier Parker, Inbarani Naidoo, Sean Jooste, Shandir Ramlagan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sibusiso SifundaHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Tholang MokheleHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Thabang ManyaapeloHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa. setsokotsane@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-6295
Natisha DukhiHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Ronel SewpaulHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Whadi-Ah ParkerHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Saahier ParkerHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Inbarani NaidooHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Sean JoosteHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Shandir RamlaganHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Razia GaidaHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Musawenkosi MabasoHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Khangelani ZumaHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Priscilla ReddyHuman Sciences Research Council, Human and Social Capabilities Research Division, Private Bag X41, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Human Sciences Research Council · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 pandemic a public health emergency of international concern. South Africa, like many other countries, initiated a multifaceted national response to the pandemic. Self-isolation and quarantine are essential components of the public health response in the country. This paper examined perceptions and preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine during the initial phase of the pandemic in South Africa.

methodsThe analysis used data obtained from an online quantitative survey conducted in all nine provinces using a data-free platform. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse the data.

resultsOf 55,823 respondents, 40.1% reported that they may end up in self-isolation or quarantine, 32.6% did not think that they would and 27.4% were unsure. Preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine was 59.0% for self, 53.8% for child and 59.9% for elderly. The odds of perceived possibility for self-isolation or quarantine were significantly higher among Coloureds, Whites, and Indians/Asians than Black Africans, and among those with moderate or high self-perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 than those with low risk perception. The odds were significantly lower among older age groups than those aged 18-29 years, and those unemployed than fully employed. The odds of preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine were significantly less likely among females than males. Preparedness for self, child and elderly isolation or quarantine was significantly more likely among other population groups than Black Africans and among older age groups than those aged 18-29 years. Preparedness for self, child and elderly isolation or quarantine was significantly less likely among those self-employed than fully employed and those residing in informal dwellings than formal dwellings. In addition, preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine was significantly less likely among those with moderate and high self-perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 than low risk perception.

conclusionThe findings highlight the challenge of implementing self-isolation or quarantine in a country with different and unique social contexts. There is a need for public awareness regarding the importance of self-isolation or quarantine as well as counter measures against contextual factors inhibiting this intervention, especially in impoverished communities.

Indexed as

QuarantineAdolescentAdultAgedChildCivil DefenseCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Disaster PlanningFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2South AfricaCOVID-19PandemicPreparednessQuarantineSelf-isolationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID33757461
PMCPMC7987115
OpenAlexW3136428260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.