Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33757281›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2021

The rates of major malformations after gestational exposure to isotretinoin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eun Jeong Choi, NaeRy Kim, Ho-Seok Kwak, Hae Ji Han, Kyoung-Chul Chun, Young-Ah Kim, Jae-Whoan Koh, Jung Yeol Han, Sung Hong Joo, Ji Sung Lee and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Retinoic acid in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Competencies and clinical guidelines for managing acne with isotretinoin in general practice: a scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eun Jeong ChoiKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
NaeRy KimKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ho-Seok KwakKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hae Ji HanKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoung-Chul ChunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Young-Ah KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Jae-Whoan KohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Jung Yeol HanKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Hong JooKorean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Sung LeeClinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gideon KorenMotherisk Israel and Adelson faculty of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRAriel University · ILKonkuk University Medical Center · KRNational Medical Center · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIsotretinoin is among the most notorious human teratogens, documented originally as causing up to 30% of malformations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the rates of major malformation (MM) among isotretinoin-exposed pregnant women over the years through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsEligible studies were searched and identified using various databases. Single-arm meta-analysis and meta-analysis of odd ratios among controlled studies were performed using Review Manager version 5.3.

resultsTen eligible studies that combined 2,783 isotretinoin-exposed women were included in our study. The rate of MM weighted for the sample size was 15%. Three studies that included an unexposed comparison group were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio of MM for isotretinoin-exposed women was 3.76. After 2006, the pooled odds ratio of MM for isotretinoin exposure was significantly lower at 1.04.

conclusionThe current rate of MM in isotretinoin-exposed women was substantially lower after 2006.

Indexed as

Congenital malformationsIsotretinoinMeta-analysisPregnancySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33757281
PMCPMC8290153
OpenAlexW3138949893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.