Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755921›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021

Identification of minimal hepatic encephalopathy based on dynamic functional connectivity.

Yue Cheng, Gaoyan Zhang, Xiaodong Zhang, Yuexuan Li, Jingli Li, Jiamin Zhou, Lixiang Huang, Shuangshuang Xie, Wen Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Machine learning techniques in hepatic encephalopathy: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yue ChengDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Gaoyan ZhangCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China. zhanggaoyan_tg@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-9658
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Yuexuan LiCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Jingli LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Jiamin ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Lixiang HuangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Shuangshuang XieDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Wen ShenDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61876126National Natural Science Foundation of China 81601482National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701679National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) metrics can better identify minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) patients from cirrhotic patients without any hepatic encephalopathy (noHE) and healthy controls (HCs). Resting-state functional MRI data were acquired from 62 patients with cirrhosis (MHE, n = 30; noHE, n = 32) and 41 HCs. We used the sliding time window approach and functional connectivity analysis to extract the time-varying properties of brain connectivity. Three DFC characteristics (i.e., strength, stability, and variability) were calculated. For comparison, we also calculated the static functional connectivity (SFC). A linear support vector machine was used to differentiate MHE patients from noHE and HCs using DFC and SFC metrics as classification features. The leave-one-out cross-validation method was used to estimate the classification performance. The strength of DFC (DFC-Dstrength) achieved the best accuracy (MHE vs. noHE, 72.5%; MHE vs. HCs, 84%; and noHE vs. HCs, 88%) compared to the other dynamic features. Compared to static features, the classification accuracies of the DFC-Dstrength feature were improved by 10.5%, 8%, and 14% for MHE vs. noHE, MHE vs. HC, and noHE vs. HCs, respectively. Based on the DFC-Dstrength, seven nodes were identified as the most discriminant features to classify MHE from noHE, including left inferior parietal lobule, left supramarginal gyrus, left calcarine, left superior frontal gyrus, left cerebellum, right postcentral gyrus, and right insula. In summary, DFC characteristics have a higher classification accuracy in identifying MHE from cirrhosis patients. Our findings suggest the usefulness of DFC in capturing neural processes and identifying disease-related biomarkers important for MHE identification.

Indexed as

Hepatic EncephalopathyBrainBrain MappingHumansLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain networkDynamic functional connectivityMachine learningMinimal hepatic encephalopathyResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.