ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021
Identification of minimal hepatic encephalopathy based on dynamic functional connectivity.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Liver transplantation promotes early neural reorganization in minimal hepatic encephalopathy: a longitudinal resting state fMRI study.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Dynamic network reconfiguration in hepatitis B cirrhosis secondary to mild hepatic encephalopathy: a multilayer network analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning techniques in hepatic encephalopathy: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The role of multifocal visual evoked potential in detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Spontaneous neural activity changes in minimal hepatic encephalopathy before and 1 month after liver transplantation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Functional connectivity disruption of insular subregions in the cirrhotic patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- Increased functional connectivity between default mode network and visual network potentially correlates with duration of residual dizziness in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Metabolic alterations in the right anterior insula among patients with cirrhosis without overt hepatic encephalopathy: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Changes in dynamic and static brain fluctuation distinguish minimal hepatic encephalopathy and cirrhosis patients and predict the severity of liver damage.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Aberrant stability of brain functional architecture in cirrhotic patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.Brain imaging and behavior · 2022Article
- Altered dynamic spontaneous neural activity in minimal hepatic encephalopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Application to Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy Diagnosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Pathological Significance and Prognostic Roles of Indirect Bilirubin/Albumin Ratio in Hepatic Encephalopathy.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate whether dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) metrics can better identify minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) patients from cirrhotic patients without any hepatic encephalopathy (noHE) and healthy controls (HCs). Resting-state functional MRI data were acquired from 62 patients with cirrhosis (MHE, n = 30; noHE, n = 32) and 41 HCs. We used the sliding time window approach and functional connectivity analysis to extract the time-varying properties of brain connectivity. Three DFC characteristics (i.e., strength, stability, and variability) were calculated. For comparison, we also calculated the static functional connectivity (SFC). A linear support vector machine was used to differentiate MHE patients from noHE and HCs using DFC and SFC metrics as classification features. The leave-one-out cross-validation method was used to estimate the classification performance. The strength of DFC (DFC-Dstrength) achieved the best accuracy (MHE vs. noHE, 72.5%; MHE vs. HCs, 84%; and noHE vs. HCs, 88%) compared to the other dynamic features. Compared to static features, the classification accuracies of the DFC-Dstrength feature were improved by 10.5%, 8%, and 14% for MHE vs. noHE, MHE vs. HC, and noHE vs. HCs, respectively. Based on the DFC-Dstrength, seven nodes were identified as the most discriminant features to classify MHE from noHE, including left inferior parietal lobule, left supramarginal gyrus, left calcarine, left superior frontal gyrus, left cerebellum, right postcentral gyrus, and right insula. In summary, DFC characteristics have a higher classification accuracy in identifying MHE from cirrhosis patients. Our findings suggest the usefulness of DFC in capturing neural processes and identifying disease-related biomarkers important for MHE identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33755921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.