Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755888›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Can the Monte Carlo method predict the toxicity of binary mixtures?

Alla P Toropova, Andrey A Toropov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alla P ToropovaLaboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri, 2, 20156, Milano, Italy. alla.toropova@marionegri.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-9963
Andrey A ToropovLaboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri, 2, 20156, Milano, Italy.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment of toxicants mainly is a result of experiments with single substances. However, toxicity in natural ecosystems typically does not result from single toxicant exposure but is rather a result of exposure to mixtures of toxicants. It is not surprising a mixture of toxicity is a subject of eco-toxicological interest for several decades. A quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR)-based approach is an attractive approach to assessing the joint effects in the binary mixtures. The validity of the proposed approach was demonstrated by comparing the predicted values against the experimentally determined values. Simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) is used for the representation of the molecular structures of components of two-component mixtures to build up QSAR. The SMILES-based models are improving if the Monte Carlo optimization aimed to define 2D-optimal descriptors apply the so-called index of ideality of correlation (IIC), which is a mathematical function of both the correlation coefficient and mean absolute error calculated for the positive and negative difference between observed and calculated values of toxicity. The average statistical quality of these models (for the validation set) is n=25, R

Indexed as

EcosystemSoftwareMolecular StructureMonte Carlo MethodQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipCORAL softwareIndex of ideality of correlationQSARRisk assessmentSMILES

Identifiers

PMID33755888
OpenAlexW3137296086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.