ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022
Efficacy of evoked potential monitoring for predicting postoperative motor status in internal carotid artery aneurysm surgeries.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of neurophysiological monitoring during posterior communicating artery aneurysm clipping for postoperative neurological deficits.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The data for 138 patients with ICA aneurysms who underwent surgical clipping as well as their intraoperative neuromonitoring data were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of MEP/SSEP changes for predicting PMDs was assessed using binary logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain a supplementary critical value of the MEP/SSEP deterioration duration. The sensitivity and specificity of MEP changes for predicting PMDs were 0.824 and 0.843, respectively. For SSEP changes, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.959, respectively. MEP and SSEP changes were identified as independent predictors for short-term (p = 0.002 and 0.011, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.040 and 0.006, respectively). The supplementary critical value for MEP deterioration duration for predicting PMDs was 14 min (p = 0.007, AUC = 0.805). For SSEP, the value was 14.5 min (p = 0.042, AUC = 0.875). The MEP/SSEP changes adjusted by those optimal values were also identified as independent predictors for short-term (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.019 and 0.003, respectively). Intraoperative MEP and SSEP deterioration durations are effective in predicting PMDs in patients with ICA aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.