Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755810›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2021

Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Sarah Jenkins, Megan E Kachur, Kamil Rechache, Justin M Wells, Stanley Lipkowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Genomic and Biologic Landscapes of Breast Cancer and Racial Differences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Jenkins *Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Megan E Kachur *Pathology Department, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Kamil Rechache *Medical Oncology Service, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Justin M Wells *Pathology Department, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA. justin.m.wells8.civ@mail.mil.
Stanley LipkowitzWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. lipkowis@navmed.nci.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6103-2255

Funding

Genomic characterization of breast cancer in high risk subsets of breast cancerZIABC011650 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LIPKOWITZ, STANLEY · 2015 to 2025
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBreast cancer is a collection of diseases including the more common invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas and rarer subtypes of breast cancer. This review summarizes the features of rare breast cancers. RECENT

findingsEach of the rare tumors has defined pathological and clinical features that impact treatment recommendations. In this review, we summarize these for each rare type of breast cancer and where available we include molecular features of each tumor. Rare subtypes of breast cancer each have unique features. In many cases, data is limited for the optimal treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingPathology, ClinicalRare DiseasesBreast cancerRare breast cancer subtypes

Identifiers

PMID33755810
PMCPMC8204849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.