Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755711›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Developing the Pneumonia-Optimized Ratio for Community-acquired pneumonia: An easy, inexpensive and accurate prognostic biomarker.

Vinícius Ferraz Cury, Lucas Quadros Antoniazzi, Paulo Henrique Kranz de Oliveira, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Sainan Voss da Cunha, Guilherme Cristianetti Frison, Enrico Emerim Moretto, Renato Seligman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vinícius Ferraz CurySchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7070-8341
Lucas Quadros AntoniazziSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique Kranz de OliveiraSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3132-8036
Wyllians Vendramini BorelliNeurology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sainan Voss da CunhaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Guilherme Cristianetti FrisonSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6172-0843
Enrico Emerim MorettoSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-0710
Renato SeligmanSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2398-6963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still a major public health problem. Prognostic scores at admission in tertiary services may improve early identification of severity and better allocation of resources, ultimately improving survival. Herein, we aimed at evaluating prognostic biomarkers of CAP and a Pneumonia-Optimized Ratio was created to improve prognostic performance.

methodsIn this retrospective study, all patients with suspected Community-acquired pneumonia aged 18 or older admitted to a public hospital from January 2019 to February 2020 were included in this study. Blood testing and clinical information at admission were collected, and the primary outcome was overall survival. CURB-65 scores and prognostic biomarkers were measured, namely Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Cell Ratio (NLCR), Platelet to Lymphocyte ratio (PLR), Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR). A Pneumonia-Optimized Ratio (POR) score was created by selecting the biomarker with larger accuracy (NLCR) and multiplying it by the patients' CURB-65 score. Multivariate regression model was performed and ROC curves were created for each biomarker.

resultsOur sample consisted of 646 individuals (median 66 years [IQR, 18-103], 53.9% females) with complete blood testing at the time of admission. Patients scored 0-1 (323, 50%), 2 (187, 28.9%), or 3 or above (122, 18.9%) in the CURB-65, and 65 (10%) presented the primary outcome of death. POR exhibited the highest Area Under Curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis (AUC = 0.753), when compared with NLCR (AUC = 0.706), PLR (AUC = 0.630) and MLR (AUC = 0.627). POR and NLCR presented increased crude mortality rate in the fourth quartile in comparison with the first quartile, and the fourth quartile of NLCR had more days of hospitalization than the first quartile (11.06±15.96 vs. 7.02±8.39, p = 0.012).

conclusionThe Pneumonia-Optimized Ratio in patients with CAP showed good prognostic performance of mortality at the admission of a tertiary service. The NLCR may also be used as an estimation of days of hospitalization. Prognostic biomarkers may provide important guidance to resource allocation in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaPrognosisYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33755711
PMCPMC7987181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.