Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755270›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Anatomical texture patterns identify cerebellar distinctions between essential tremor and Parkinson's disease.

Kilian Hett, Ilwoo Lyu, Paula Trujillo, Alexander M Lopez, Megan Aumann, Kathleen E Larson, Peter Hedera, Benoit Dawant, Bennett A Landman, Daniel O Claassen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aging, Neurodegenerative Disorders, and Cerebellum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kilian HettDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-4247
Ilwoo LyuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Paula TrujilloDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alexander M LopezDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Megan AumannDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kathleen E LarsonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Peter HederaDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Benoit DawantDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Daniel O ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ipek OguzDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Early detection of Huntington's Disease: Longitudinal analysis of basal ganglia and cortical thicknessR01NS094456 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI OGUZ, IPEK · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIH HHS R01-NS094456NIH HHS R01- NS095291NIH HHS R01-NS0997783NIH HHS U01-NS106845NIH HHS UL1 RR 024975NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voxel-based morphometry is an established technique to study focal structural brain differences in neurologic disease. More recently, texture-based analysis methods have enabled a pattern-based assessment of group differences, at the patch level rather than at the voxel level, allowing a more sensitive localization of structural differences between patient populations. In this study, we propose a texture-based approach to identify structural differences between the cerebellum of patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 280) and essential tremor (n = 109). We analyzed anatomical differences of the cerebellum among patients using two features: T1-weighted MRI intensity, and a texture-based similarity feature. Our results show anatomical differences between groups that are localized to the inferior part of the cerebellar cortex. Both the T1-weighted intensity and texture showed differences in lobules VIII and IX, vermis VIII and IX, and middle peduncle, but the texture analysis revealed additional differences in the dentate nucleus, lobules VI and VII, vermis VI and VII. This comparison emphasizes how T1-weighted intensity and texture-based methods can provide a complementary anatomical structure analysis. While texture-based similarity shows high sensitivity for gray matter differences, T1-weighted intensity shows sensitivity for the detection of white matter differences.

Indexed as

AgedCerebellumDiagnosis, DifferentialEssential TremorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingParkinson Diseasecerebellar analysisessential tremorsParkinson's diseasetexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID33755270
PMCPMC8090778
OpenAlexW3137993773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.