Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755236›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Improved whole-brain SNR with an integrated high-permittivity material in a head array at 7T.

Karthik Lakshmanan, Giuseppe Carluccio, Jerzy Walczyk, Ryan Brown, Sebastian Rupprecht, Qing X Yang, Michael T Lanagan, Christopher M Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In vivoMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repeatability of BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karthik LakshmananBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0187-495X
Giuseppe CarluccioBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Jerzy WalczykBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ryan BrownBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sebastian RupprechtHyQRS, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qing X YangHyQRS, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael T LanaganHyQRS, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher M CollinsBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4928-7503

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Next-Generation RF Coils with High-Permittivity Material for Improved Performance in MRIR01EB021277 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COLLINS, CHRISTOPHER M · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo demonstrate that strategic use of materials with high electric permittivity along with integrated head-sized coil arrays can improve SNR in the entire brain.

methodsNumerical simulations were used to design a high-permittivity material (HPM) helmet for enhancing SNR throughout the brain in receive arrays of 8 and 28 channels. Then, two 30-channel head coils of identical geometry were constructed: one fitted with a prototype helmet-shaped ceramic HPM helmet, and the second with a helmet-shaped low-permittivity shell, each 8-mm thick. An eight-channel dipole array was used for excitation. In vivo maps of excitation flip angle and SNR were acquired.

resultsSimulation results showed improvement in transmit efficiency by up to 65% and in receive-side SNR by up to 47% on average through the head with use of an HPM helmet. Experimental results showed that experimental transmit efficiency was improved by approximately 56% at the center of brain, and experimental receive-side SNR (SNR normalized to flip angle) was improved by approximately 21% on average through orthogonal planes through the cerebrum, including at the center of the brain, with the HPM.

conclusionAlthough HPM is used increasingly to improve transmit efficiency locally in situations in which the transmit coil and imaging volume are much larger than the HPM, here we demonstrate that HPM can also be used to improve transmit efficiency and receive-side SNR throughout the brain by improving performance of a head-sized receive array. This includes the center of the brain, where it is difficult to improve SNR by other means.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadio WavesBrainEquipment DesignPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatiocoilefficiencyMRIpermittivitySNR

Identifiers

PMID33755236
PMCPMC8208524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.