Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33755093›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2021

Immunotherapy perspectives in the new era of B-cell editing.

Natsuko Ueda, Marine Cahen, Yannic Danger, Jérôme Moreaux, Christophe Sirac, Michel Cogné

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. In vivo tracking of ex-vivo-generatedMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adenoviral vectors infect B lymphocytes in vivo.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  11. Precision Genome Engineering in Human Disease: Expanding Therapeutic Roles of CRISPR Technologies.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natsuko UedaINSERM U1236, University of Rennes 1, Etablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France.
Marine CahenINSERM U1262, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7276, Limoges University, Limoges, France; and.
Yannic DangerINSERM U1236, University of Rennes 1, Etablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France.
Jérôme MoreauxCNRS UMR 9002, Institute of Human Genetics, Montpellier, France.
Christophe SiracINSERM U1262, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7276, Limoges University, Limoges, France; and.
Michel CognéINSERM U1236, University of Rennes 1, Etablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early days of vaccination, targeted immunotherapy has gone through multiple conceptual changes and challenges. It now provides the most efficient and up-to-date strategies for either preventing or treating infections and cancer. Its most recent and successful weapons are autologous T cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors, engineered purposely for binding cancer-specific antigens and therefore used for so-called adoptive immunotherapy. We now face the merger of such achievements in cell therapy: using lymphocytes redirected on purpose to bind specific antigens and the  clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) revolution, which conferred genome-editing methodologies with both safety and efficacy. This unique affiliation will soon and considerably expand the scope of diseases susceptible to adoptive immunotherapy and of immune cells available for being reshaped as therapeutic tools, including B cells. Following the monumental success story of passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), we are thus entering into a new era, where a combination of gene therapy/cell therapy will enable reprogramming of the patient's immune system and notably endow his B cells with the ability to produce therapeutic mAbs on their own.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenB-LymphocytesGene EditingHumansImmunotherapyReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID33755093
PMCPMC7993091
OpenAlexW3136306870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.