ArticleRadiology2021
Assessing Rectal Cancer Treatment Response Using Coregistered Endorectal Photoacoustic and US Imaging Paired with Deep Learning.
Article in Radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04339374 (Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Co-registered Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Co-registered Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoacoustic-ultrasound endoscopy for assessment of rectal cancer treatment response: A prospective study with T2-weighted MRI radiomics comparison.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- All-fiber photoacoustic endomicroscopy reveals layer-specific angiogenesis-oxygenation uncoupling in experimental colitis.Science advances · 2026Article
- Photoacoustic Microscopy for Multiscale Biological System Visualization and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Optical and Optoacoustic Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Guided Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography for 3D Imaging of the Murine Colon.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A primer on current status and future opportunities of clinical optoacoustic imaging.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- A portable photoacoustic microscopy and ultrasound system for rectal cancer imaging.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- TowardsFundamental research · 2024Review
- Perspectives on endoscopic functional photoacoustic microscopy.Applied physics letters · 2024Article
- Cancer detection and classification using a simplified binary state vector machine.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Acoustic resolution photoacoustic Doppler flowmetry for assessment of patient rectal cancer blood perfusion.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023Article
- Advances in photoacoustic imaging aided by nano contrast agents: special focus on role of lymphatic system imaging for cancer theranostics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Photoacoustic clinical applications: Musculoskeletal and abdominal imaging.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- A Coregistered Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging Protocol for the Transvaginal Imaging of Ovarian Lesions.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- Preoperative Immunocite-Derived Ratios Predict Surgical Complications Better when Artificial Neural Networks Are Used for Analysis-A Pilot Comparative Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Confocal laser endomicroscope with distal MEMS scanner for real-time histopathology.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Looking deep inside tissue with photoacoustic molecular probes: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Review
- Photoacoustic imaging aided with deep learning: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2022Review
- Application of Radiomics in Predicting Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Strategies and Challenges.Journal of oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Conventional radiologic modalities perform poorly in the radiated rectum and are often unable to differentiate residual cancer from treatment scarring. Purpose To report the development and initial patient study of an imaging system comprising an endorectal coregistered photoacoustic (PA) microscopy (PAM) and US system paired with a convolution neural network (CNN) to assess the rectal cancer treatment response. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04339374), participants completed radiation and chemotherapy from September 2019 to September 2020 and images were obtained with the PAM/US system prior to surgery. Another group's colorectal specimens were studied ex vivo. The PAM/US system consisted of an endorectal imaging probe, a 1064-nm laser, and one US ring transducer. The PAM CNN and US CNN models were trained and validated to distinguish normal from malignant colorectal tissue using ex vivo and in vivo patient data. The PAM CNN and US CNN were then tested using additional in vivo patient data that had not been seen by the CNNs during training and validation. Results Twenty-two patients' ex vivo specimens and five patients' in vivo images (a total of 2693 US regions of interest [ROIs] and 2208 PA ROIs) were used for CNN training and validation. Data from five additional patients were used for testing. A total of 32 participants (mean age, 60 years; range, 35-89 years) were evaluated. Unique PAM imaging markers of the complete tumor response were found, specifically including recovery of normal submucosal vascular architecture within the treated tumor bed. The PAM CNN model captured this recovery process and correctly differentiated these changes from the residual tumor. The imaging system remained highly capable of differentiating tumor from normal tissue, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99) for data from five participants. By comparison, the US CNN had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.73). Conclusion An endorectal coregistered photoacoustic microscopy/US system paired with a convolutional neural network model showed high diagnostic performance in assessing the rectal cancer treatment response and demonstrated potential for optimizing posttreatment management. © RSNA, 2021
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.