Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33754796›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Characteristics of Populations Excluded From Clinical Trials Supporting Intensive Blood Pressure Control Guidelines.

Timothy S Anderson, Michelle C Odden, Joanne Penko, Dhruv S Kazi, Brandon K Bellows, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Low Should You Go in the Presence of Frailty?Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy S AndersonDivision of General Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.
Michelle C OddenDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health Stanford University Stanford CA.
Joanne PenkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA.
Dhruv S KaziRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.
Brandon K BellowsDivision of General Medicine Columbia University New York NY.
Kirsten Bibbins-DomingoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA.
San Francisco General Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USColumbia University · USStanford Health Care · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Hypertension Management in Minority and Low-income PopulationsK24DK103992 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BIBBINS-DOMINGO, KIRSTEN · 2014 to 2018
$917k
Comparing the value of intensive systolic blood pressure treatment implementation strategiesK01HL140170 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BELLOWS, BRANDON K · 2018 to 2022
$709k
Impact of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Older AdultsR03AG064373 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, TIMOTHY S · 2019 to 2020
$274k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL140170NIA NIH HHS L30 AG060493NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064373NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK103992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Only one third of patients recommended intensified treatment by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline for high blood pressure would have been eligible for the clinical trials on which recommendations were largely based. We sought to identify characteristics of adults who would have been trial-ineligible in order to inform clinical practice and research priorities. Methods and Results We examined the proportion of adults diagnosed with hypertension who met trial inclusion and exclusion criteria, stratified by age, diabetes mellitus status, and guideline recommendations in a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2016. Of the 107.7 million adults (95% CI, 99.3-116.0 million) classified as having hypertension by the ACC/AHA guideline, 23.1% (95% CI, 20.8%-25.5%) were below the target blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg, 22.2% (95% CI, 20.1%-24.4%) would be recommended nonpharmacologic treatment, and 54.6% (95% CI, 52.5%-56.7%) would be recommended additional pharmacotherapy. Only 20.6% (95% CI, 18.8%-22.4%) of adults with hypertension would be trial-eligible. The majority of adults <50 years were excluded because of low cardiovascular risk and lack of access to primary care. The majority of adults aged ≥70 years were excluded because of multimorbidity and limited life expectancy. Reasons for trial exclusion were similar for patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Intensive blood pressure treatment trials were not representative of many younger adults with low cardiovascular risk and older adults with multimorbidity who are now recommended more intensive blood pressure goals.

Indexed as

Nutrition SurveysPractice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmerican Heart AssociationAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiologyClinical Trials as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionAntihypertensive Agentsclinical trialsguidelineshypertension

Identifiers

PMID33754796
PMCPMC8174340
OpenAlexW3138660912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.