ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2021
In vivo photoacoustic assessment of the oxygen saturation changes in the human radial artery: a preliminary study associated with age.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photoacoustic imaging of oxygen saturation in the radial arterial wall and perivascular tissue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of salivary glands in patients with clinically suspected Sjögren's disease: A pilot study.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Quantitative ultrasound and photoacoustic assessments of red blood cell aggregation in the human radial artery.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Study of erythrocyte sedimentation in human blood through the photoacoustic signals analysis.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- Detection of clot formation & lysisPhotoacoustics · 2023Article
- Optoacoustic biomarkers of lipids, hemorrhage and inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Tracheal Stenosis in Rabbits Using Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceWe demonstrate the potential of probing the sO2 change under blood flow in vivo using photoacoustic (PA) imaging and sheds light on the complex relationship between RBC aggregation and oxygen delivery.
aimTo conduct in vivo assessments of the sO2 in the radial artery of healthy volunteers and simultaneously probe the relation between the sO2 and hemodynamic behavior such as red blood cell (RBC) aggregation. APPROACH: The effects of PA-based measurements of blood hemodynamics were studied as a function of the subjects' age (20s, 30s, and 40s). The pulsatile blood flow in the human radial artery of 12 healthy subjects was imaged in the 700 to 900 nm optical wavelength range using a linear array-based PA system.
resultsThe PA power when blood velocity is minimum (Pamax) was larger than the one attained at maximum blood velocity (Pamin), consistent with predictions based on the cyclical variation of RBC aggregation during pulsatile flow. The difference between Pamin and Pamax at 800 nm (ΔPa800) increased with age (1.7, 2.2, and 2.6 dB for age group of 20s, 30s, and 40s, respectively). The sO2 computed from Pamax was larger than the one from Pamin.
conclusionsThe ΔPa800 increased with participant age. The ΔPa800 metric could be a surrogate of noninvasively monitoring the age-induced changes in RBC aggregation. The sO2 change during a cycle of pulsatile blood flow also increased with age, demonstrating that RBC aggregation can affect the sO2 change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.