Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33754512›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Clinical and Virologic Effectiveness of Remdesivir Treatment for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea: a Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Eun Jeong Joo, Jae Hoon Ko, Seong Eun Kim, Seung Ji Kang, Ji Hyeon Baek, Eun Young Heo, Hye Jin Shi, Joong Sik Eom, Pyoeng Gyun Choe, Seongman Bae and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical outcomes of remdesivir-treated COVID-19 patients in South Korea.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Jeong Joo *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4741-4406
Jae Hoon Ko *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-6609
Seong Eun Kim *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-6155
Seung Ji KangDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-0520
Ji Hyeon BaekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-6950
Eun Young HeoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-4903
Hye Jin ShiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7571-8485
Joong Sik EomDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-1159
Pyoeng Gyun ChoeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-7918
Seongman BaeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-3657
Sang Hyun RaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-3331
Da Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-2286
Baek Nam KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-2132
Yu Min KangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-9878
Ji Yeon KimDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Seongnam Citizens Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-1497
Jin Won ChungDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-6056
Hyun Ha ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-2121
Sohyun BaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-7108
Shinhyea CheonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-121X
Yoonseon ParkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-3606
Heun ChoiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-9381
Eunjung LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-8288
Bo Young LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-3822
Jung Wan ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9603-1404
Yujin SohnDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-8641
Jung Yeon HeoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6548-1939
Sung Han KimDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kimsunghanmd@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-8253
Kyong Ran PeckDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. krpeck@skku.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-9780
Ulsan College · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRGachon University · KRNational Health Insurance Service · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRAjou University · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRChosun University · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KRChungnam National University · KRInha University · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRKyungpook National University · KRMyongji Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemdesivir is widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but controversies regarding its efficacy still remain.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of remdesivir on clinical and virologic outcomes of severe COVID-19 patients from June to July 2020. Primary clinical endpoints included clinical recovery, additional mechanical ventilator (MV) support, and duration of oxygen or MV support. Viral load reduction by hospital day (HD) 15 was evaluated by calculating changes in cycle threshold (Ct) values.

resultsA total of 86 severe COVID-19 patients were evaluated including 48 remdesivir-treated patients. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Remdesivir was administered an average of 7.42 days from symptom onset. The proportions of clinical recovery of the remdesivir and supportive care group at HD 14 (56.3% and 39.5%) and HD 28 (87.5% and 78.9%) were not statistically different. The proportion of patients requiring MV support by HD 28 was significantly lower in the remdesivir group than in the supportive care group (22.9% vs. 44.7%,

conclusionThe remdesivir group showed clinical and virologic benefit in terms of MV requirement and viral load reduction, supporting remdesivir treatment for severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAgedAged, 80 and overAlanineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesViral LoadAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirClinicalCOVID-19RemdesivirSevereVirologic

Identifiers

PMID33754512
PMCPMC7985289
OpenAlexW3137464688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.