ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2021
Article-Level Metrics.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic lupus erythematosus-related infections in pregnancy: a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Journal metrics of the top-ranked Orthopaedic, Medical, and Surgical journals - A cross-sectional, comparative study.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- ChatGPT and Corporations of Mega-journals Jeopardize the Norms That Underpin Academic Publishing.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- Seeing Is Believing: The Effect of Graphical Abstracts on Citations and Social Media Exposure in Gastroenterology & Hepatology Journals.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the global literature productivity of adult-onset Still's disease (2011-2020).Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Contribution of Arab countries to Behçet disease research: a PubMed-based bibliometric and altmetric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2022Observational
- Harnessing the True Power of Altmetrics to Track Engagement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- From traditional Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: Socialising the research metrics.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- Root Canal Disinfection Articles with the Highest Relative Citation Ratios. A Bibliometric Analysis from 1990 to 2019.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bibliometric and Altmetric Analyses of Publication Activity in the Field of Behcet's Disease in 2010-2019.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Modern Health Journalism and the Impact of Social Media.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of digitization and Open Access, article-level metrics are increasingly employed to distinguish influential research works and adjust research management strategies. Tagging individual articles with digital object identifiers allows exposing them to numerous channels of scholarly communication and quantifying related activities. The aim of this article was to overview currently available article-level metrics and highlight their advantages and limitations. Article views and downloads, citations, and social media metrics are increasingly employed by publishers to move away from the dominance and inappropriate use of journal metrics. Quantitative article metrics are complementary to one another and often require qualitative expert evaluations. Expert evaluations may help to avoid manipulations with indiscriminate social media activities that artificially boost altmetrics. Values of article metrics should be interpreted in view of confounders such as patterns of citation and social media activities across countries and academic disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.