Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33754462›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2021

Maternal ethnicity and the prevalence of British pregnancies affected by neural tube defects.

Jordana N Peake, Rachel L Knowles, Jill Shawe, Judith Rankin, Andrew J Copp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A topographical analysis of encephalocele locations: generation of a standardised atlas and cluster analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Neural Tube Defects and Folate Deficiency: Is DNA Repair Defective?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jordana N PeakeDevelopmental Biology and Cancer Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Rachel L KnowlesPopulation, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Jill ShaweFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Judith RankinPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andrew J CoppDevelopmental Biology and Cancer Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2544-9117
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 087525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew data are available on the prevalence of neural tube defects (NTDs) within different ethnic communities of the United Kingdom. This study aimed to calculate prevalence estimates for NTD-affected pregnancies, classified by maternal ethnicity, and to explore why variations in prevalence might exist.

methodsA cross-sectional study was performed with data from regional congenital anomaly registers in England and Wales, for NTD-affected pregnancies between 2006 and 2011. Using binomial regression models, we examined NTD-affected pregnancy prevalence estimates and rate ratios (PRRs), by maternal ethnicity.

resultsThe prevalence of NTDs was 12.14 per 10,000 births, with no differences between study years. Anencephaly, encephalocele and spina bifida occurred at 4.98, 1.37 and 5.80 per 10,000 births respectively. Mothers of Indian ethnicity were 1.84 times more likely (95% CI: 1.24, 2.73) and Bangladeshi mothers 2.86 times more likely (95% CI: 1.48, 5.53) than White mothers to have an NTD-affected pregnancy, after adjusting for maternal deprivation and maternal age. The excess prevalence in Indian mothers was specifically for anencephaly (PRR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.52, 4.34), and in Bangladeshi mothers the trend was for increased spina bifida (PRR 3.86; 95% CI: 0.72, 8.69). Anencephaly in Indian mothers was especially associated with other congenital anomalies (non-isolated NTDs).

conclusionsDifferent British ethnic groups vary in NTD prevalence. The excess prevalence of anencephaly as a non-isolated NTD in pregnancies of Indian mothers could indicate involvement of genetic or other unmeasured behavioral factors. Future work is needed to seek etiological explanations for the ethnicity differences and to develop improved methods for primary prevention.

Indexed as

AnencephalyNeural Tube DefectsCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceethnicityneural tube defectspregnancypreventionspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID33754462
PMCPMC7611580
OpenAlexW3137425009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.