ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apparent Talker Variability and Speaking Style Similarity Can Enhance Comprehension of Novel L2-Accented Talkers.Language and speech · 2026Article
- Measuring age-related differences in phonetic gradiency with the visual analogue scale and eye tracking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Listeners rapidly adapt to current conditions: "Good-enough" adaptation in multitalker speech perception.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Limited learning and adaptation in disfluency processing among older adults.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Cents and shenshibility: The role of reward in talker-specific phonetic recalibration.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Individual differences in the perception of phonetic category structure predict speech-in-noise performance.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- When Jack isn't Jacques: Simultaneous opposite language-specific speech perceptual learning in French-English bilinguals.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- The Cerebellum Is Sensitive to the Lexical Properties of Words During Spoken Language Comprehension.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Influence of talker and accent variability on rapid adaptation and generalization to non-native accented speech in younger and older adults.Auditory perception & cognition · 2024Article
- Right Posterior Temporal Cortex Supports Integration of Phonetic and Talker Information.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Rapid but specific perceptual learning partially explains individual differences in the recognition of challenging speech.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Reliability and validity for perceptual flexibility in speech.Brain and language · 2022Article
- Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Because different talkers produce their speech sounds differently, listeners benefit from maintaining distinct generative models (sets of beliefs) about the correspondence between acoustic information and phonetic categories for different talkers. A robust literature on phonetic recalibration indicates that when listeners encounter a talker who produces their speech sounds idiosyncratically (e.g., a talker who produces their /s/ sound atypically), they can update their generative model for that talker. Such recalibration has been shown to occur in a relatively talker-specific way. Because listeners in ecological situations often meet several new talkers at once, the present study considered how the process of simultaneously updating two distinct generative models compares to updating one model at a time. Listeners were exposed to two talkers, one who produced /s/ atypically and one who produced /∫/ atypically. Critically, these talkers only produced these sounds in contexts where lexical information disambiguated the phoneme's identity (e.g., epi_ode, flouri_ing). When initial exposure to the two talkers was blocked by voice (Experiment 1), listeners recalibrated to these talkers after relatively little exposure to each talker (32 instances per talker, of which 16 contained ambiguous fricatives). However, when the talkers were intermixed during learning (Experiment 2), listeners required more exposure trials before they were able to adapt to the idiosyncratic productions of these talkers (64 instances per talker, of which 32 contained ambiguous fricatives). Results suggest that there is a perceptual cost to simultaneously updating multiple distinct generative models, potentially because listeners must first select which generative model to update.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.